Depending on what the developer intends to do with the source, I can see it as a benefit if CVS Ecliipse-SourceReferences does not work. If the developer creates and contributes a patch using CVS, it will be rather difficult to merge it.
- Konstantin From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carl Anderson Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 10:24 AM To: Cross project issues Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Cannot find GIT replacement now that Anonymous CVS is broken for Hudson builds Denis, Was it really necessary to terminate the anonymous service? I am just worried about the impact that that will have on WTP users who wish to get the source for the Juno release (and prior releases). We went to the effort of putting in the appropriate Eclipse-SourceReferences information in all of our plugins, and all through the Juno release, these were set up for anonymous CVS access to our source. Now those Eclipse-SourceReferences are useless. Is there really no possibility of restoring the read-only anonymous access? (And I know that WTP is not the only project that set up Eclipse-SourceReferences to CVS code- even the platform in all of its Indigo releases, has CVS Eclipse-SourceReferences.) FWIW, - Carl Anderson WTP programmer Inactive hide details for Denis Roy ---12/29/2012 10:25:54 AM---On 12/29/2012 09:52 AM, Ed Willink wrote: > HiDenis Roy ---12/29/2012 10:25:54 AM---On 12/29/2012 09:52 AM, Ed Willink wrote: > Hi From: Denis Roy <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 12/29/2012 10:25 AM Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Cannot find GIT replacement now that Anonymous CVS is broken for Hudson builds Sent by: [email protected] _____ On 12/29/2012 09:52 AM, Ed Willink wrote: > Hi > > But if CVS only went readonly as announced why does anonymous readonly > access fail? Because we've terminated the anonymous CVS service. > > Unfortunately there is no org.eclipse.test project. It is kind of part > of the platform which has about 10 GITs, 5 for releng. Hence the > question; is there a broswer/search tool. You can browse repos here: http://git.eclipse.org/c If you can't find it, then you could ask on that project's -dev list :-) Denis > > Regards > > Ed Willink > > > On 29/12/2012 14:37, Denis Roy wrote: >> You can still access the direct filesystem from Hudson/Build. >> >> Replace :pserver:[email protected]:/cvsroot/repo with >> /cvsroot/repo or file:///cvsroot/repo <file:///\\cvsroot\repo> is a URI is required. >> >> But really, as you know, the underlying CVS repository is no longer >> being maintained, and switching your build to using the project's Git >> repo is better. >> >> To locate the new Git repo , I would navigate to that project's >> website. I would expect to see information on the source >> repositories there. >> >> Denis >> >> >> >> >> >> On 12/29/2012 08:44 AM, Ed Willink wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> It seems we are not allowed to use even anonymous CVS access any >>> more; https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=397237 >>> >>> This breaks any build that continues to use CVS to load >>> org.eclipse.test. >>> >>> Looking for the GIT replacement, I first tried EMF's releng; no >>> EMF's going to break too. >>> >>> Then I tried browsing /gitroot; not obvious. >>> >>> Then I tried searching wiki; no useful matches for org.eclipse.test >>> and GIT. >>> >>> So, how does one locate the GIT repo, P2 repo, for a given >>> org.eclipse plugin? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Ed Willink >>> _______________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
<<image001.gif>>
<<image003.png>>
<<image004.png>>
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
