Thanks Eike, 

I will definitely take a look into it. 

Cheers
Alexander

Am 24.03.2014 um 03:20 schrieb Eike Stepper <[email protected]>:

> Hi Alexander,
> 
> With respect to forgetting to increase the micro versions properly I'd like 
> to point you to the "Version Management" Builder that Ed and I have 
> developed. It automatically creates and maintains a binary baseline (simple 
> files release.xml and release.digest). According to this baseline and your 
> changes it suggests micro version increments of +1 or +100 (depends on the 
> stream configuration in a release.properties file). The builder optionally 
> manages all version segments of features depending on their transitive 
> contents. If you're interested install the tool from 
> http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/cdo/updates/integration and try it 
> out. I don't want to miss it anymore ;-)
> 
> Cheers
> /Eike
> 
> ----
> http://www.esc-net.de
> http://thegordian.blogspot.com
> http://twitter.com/eikestepper
> 
> 
> 
> Am 24.03.2014 02:38, schrieb Alexander Nyßen:
>> I am not sure whether this is the right location to ask, but I have a 
>> question w.r.t. to the correct versioning of our bundles for the Luna 3.9.2 
>> release of GEF:
>> 
>> For Kepler SR1 we have shipped GEF 3.9.1 (feature-version), which contained 
>> org.eclipse.draw2d 3.9.0 (which actually remained unchanged from 3.9.0 
>> release) and org.eclipse.gef.3.9.0 (which should actually have been 3.9.1, 
>> because there was a service level change from 3.9.0, but which was not 
>> updated either). Both bundles have changed again since the GEF 3.9.1 release 
>> (while again only service-level bugfixes). As GEF 3.9.2 (feature-version) is 
>> developed on the master branch (Luna stream), while GEF 3.9.1 
>> (feature-version) was developed on the Kepler maintenance stream, should we 
>> rather increase the versions of both bundles to 3.9.100 now to indicate we 
>> are on a new development stream, or rather to 3.9.1 (or in case of 
>> org.eclipse.gef to a more appropriate 3.9.2 because 3.9.1 should already 
>> have been included in GEF 3.9.1)?
>> 
>> Best Regards
>> Alexander
>> --
>> Dr. Alexander Nyßen
>> Dipl.-Inform.
>> Software-Engineer
>> 
>> Telefon: +49 (0) 231 / 98 60-210
>> Telefax: +49 (0) 231 / 98 60-211
>> Mobil: +49 (0) 151 /  17396743
>> 
>> http://www.itemis.de
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> itemis AG
>> Am Brambusch 15-24
>> 44536 Lünen
>> 
>> Rechtlicher Hinweis:
>> 
>> Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 20621
>> 
>> Vorstand: Jens Wagener (Vors.), Wolfgang Neuhaus, Dr. Georg Pietrek, Jens 
>> Trompeter, Sebastian Neus
>> 
>> Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Burkhard Igel (Vors.), Stephan Grollmann, Michael Neuhaus
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

--
Dr. Alexander Nyßen
Dipl.-Inform.
Software-Engineer

Telefon: +49 (0) 231 / 98 60-210
Telefax: +49 (0) 231 / 98 60-211
Mobil: +49 (0) 151 /  17396743

http://www.itemis.de 
[email protected] 

itemis AG
Am Brambusch 15-24
44536 Lünen

Rechtlicher Hinweis:

Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 20621

Vorstand: Jens Wagener (Vors.), Wolfgang Neuhaus, Dr. Georg Pietrek, Jens 
Trompeter, Sebastian Neus

Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Burkhard Igel (Vors.), Stephan Grollmann, Michael Neuhaus


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to