Am 27.03.2014 02:46, schrieb Alexander Nyßen:
Eike and David, thanks for your detailed answers!

David, indeed I was aware about the versioning guidelines document in the wiki, 
but I was not exactly sure about whether
I really had understood it correctly. It seems I had, so I will probably have 
to update both plug-ins to 3.9.100 because
we are in a new release stream. Thanks for the clarification.

Eike, thanks for your support. I already took a first glimpse at the tool but 
did not fully get it to work. The problem
was I did not understand how the tool actually computes its baseline, i.e. I 
did not know I had to apply step 4 (I
thought it would probably use the API-baselines I had defined). That makes 
things a lot clearer now...

While the guideline document is not so explicit about this, Eikes tool actually 
also proposes to update features
versions according to the version changes of (transitively) contained projects 
(I already saw that in my first attempt).
That seems to be logical at some point, because if we want to use 3.9.100 
versions for bundles in the release stream, so
that can later use 3.9.3, 3.9.4, etc. in the maintenance stream without 
conflict, it would only be reasonable to do so
for the containing features as well.

Having said so, it seems I will then have to announce a GEF 3.9.100 release 
instead of a 3.9.2 release for Luna, right?

If the previous release from that stream/branch was 3.9.0 then yes ;-)

Cheers
/Eike

----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to