Markus

 

I think you have captured many of the key concerns so I would like to try to 
respond. I don’t expect to change your opinion but I do believe a response is 
due and hopefully I can express a point of view.

 

Btw, I am flying to Europe this afternoon so I apologize in advance if I don’t 
respond quickly to this thread.

 

 

So late in the release cycle?

>> The initial bug was opened in March and the initial code was available in 
>> M7. Unfortunately I only made cross-projects aware now. 


Without any broader involvement of and verification by the Eclipse community? 
Just an announcement after Neon RC3 (or after Platform RC4)?

>> Point taken. 


Not as an opt-in like in AERI?

>> If I understand correctly AERI collects email addresses. UUID is not 
>> associated with personable identifiable information.


Without any further notice to the user at all?

>> A notice is in the 4.6 N&N. I can also broadcast to wider channels.


WITHOUT any working opt-out mechanism? Giving the user the theoretical chance 
to edit a file and set a property to '0' cannot be called a valid opt-out 
option.

>> Not sure why you say this is theoretical. We could look at a UI in the 
>> preferences but my guess is the real concern is the opt-in vs opt-out.

Let me try to explain the opt-out reasoning. Again, I don’t expect to change 
your opinion. 

We have been analyzing the log files for p2, mpc and download servers using IP 
addresses. Unfortunately, it is difficult to equate one IP with one developer. 
Some IP addresses represent many developers, some seem to be spamming our 
servers with repetitive calls. We couldn’t determine if one IP address was 
skewing out data or not. If the goal is to provide reports that show overall 
trends we need to find a better way. This is why we asked for the UUID. 
However, if the UUID is opt-in then we won’t improve on the existing IP address 
approach.


And all that from an Open Source organisation?

>> The starting point has been we can use this data to improve the Eclipse 
>> community. I hope that if we can start using real facts based on data, not 
>> guesses, this will be a service for the entire community. Most organization 
>> are now moving towards data-driven decision making. I think Eclipse should 
>> be moving in this direction too. 



I believe our users downloading Eclipse deserve more respect. Silently 
introducing even more user tracking is nothing that I want to be identified 
with.



Markus



 

On 4 June 2016 at 10:31, Ed Willink <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Hi

This hardly seems last minute at all. My ${user.home}/.eclipse/eclipse.uuid has 
a

#Tue May 03 08:41:32 BST 2016

timestamp indicating that it was almost certainly created by M7. Why the one 
month delay in notifying us?

Why no start up dialog in M7 onwards informing us that we are being default 
opted in?

    Regards 

        Ed Willink

On 04/06/2016 06:50, Christian Campo wrote:

hi

 

is that a last minute idea that came up recently or why is it only revealed now 
that is pretty much too late for any change ?


Gruß 

 

Christian


Am 03.06.2016 um 17:13 schrieb Ian Skerrett <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >:

All,

I wanted to make everyone aware that a UUID has been added to the Eclipse 
Platform [1] and is available in the current Neon RC.  This was done at the 
request of the Eclipse Foundation. 

 

The UUID is automatically generated and stored in the 
${user.home}/.eclipse/eclipse.uuid file. The UUID does not contain any 
personally identifiable information. If a user do not want to have this 
property set they are instructed to set eclipse.uuid=0. Information about the 
UUID has been included in the Eclipse Platform N&N [2].

The UUID will be automatically added to the user-agent of http requests to 
*.eclipse.org <http://eclipse.org>  servers. For Neon, the projects that make 
these types of requests include p2 [1], MPC [3] and AERI [4]. I would expect 
other projects will add a uuid in the future. 

 

The immediate questions for many people are 1) why are we doing this, and 2) 
what about the privacy concerns.  Let me attempt to answer both of these 
questions.

Why are we doing this?

The Eclipse Foundation has started an program to better understand our user 
community. We are using a log file analysis service, Splunk, to analyze many of 
our log files to get a better idea of how people are using Eclipse. For 
instance, how many people actively use Eclipse, what version of Java is the 
most popular with the Eclipse user community, what version of Eclipse Platform 
is being used or what operating system is being used? In the past, this type of 
information was typically a ‘best guess’. We believe can do better by having 
the actual data of our user community. The UUID will allow us to get a more 
accurate answer to many of these questions.

What about the privacy concerns?

The UUID is anonymous and does not contain personably identifiable information. 
We only intend to use and analyze the UUID at an aggregate level. A user is 
able to opt-out of sending a UUID by setting eclipse.uuid=0. The Eclipse 
Foundation has a published Privacy Policy [5] that details our specific 
practices.

 Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. I appreciate this 
might be a sensitive topic but I do believe it is the right thing to do for the 
Eclipse community.

Regards

Ian

 

 [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=490112

[2] https://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/news/4.6/platform.php

[2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=492916

[3] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=492917

[4] https://eclipse.org/legal/privacy.php

 

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

-------------------------------------------------------------
compeople AG
Untermainanlage 8
60329 Frankfurt/Main
fon: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 0
fax: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 22
web: www.compeople.de <http://www.compeople.de> 

Vorstand: Jürgen Wiesmaier
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christian Glanz

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt/Main
Handelsregister Frankfurt HRB 56759
USt-IdNr. DE207665352
-------------------------------------------------------------



_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

 


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

 

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to