David,

yes, you are right Graphiti is a framework. On the other hand we have 
dependencies to GEF and EMF Transactions/Validation with is at +2.

Graphiti has been on +3 since it joined the release train, so far it has never 
been an issue. Or at least these issues did not reach me.

In case any user of Graphiti struggles with this, this would be a good time to 
speak up. I'm open towards changing to an earlier day in case that is required.

Thanks,
Michael

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David M 
Williams
Sent: Montag, 18. Juli 2016 16:25
To: Cross project issues <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Graphiti participating in Oxygen

I believe Graphiti is a "framework", right? To be used by others? As such +3 
does not make much sense. +3 is more for "leaf" components that no one else 
depends on. +1 or +2 makes more sense to me, depending on what you depend on.

As always, feel free to correct any misconceptions I have.





From:        "Wenz, Michael" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To:        Cross project issues 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
Date:        07/18/2016 02:23 AM
Subject:        [cross-project-issues-dev] Graphiti participating in Oxygen
Sent by:        
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
________________________________



Hi,

Graphiti will be participating in Oxygen:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.graphiti/releases/0.14.0

Offset will be +3.

Michael_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to