Hi
Comments inline.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 18/07/2016 16:42, Doug Schaefer wrote:
The +# days thing has never made sense, really. If you really chain
dependencies I’m sure you’d get into double digits. In fact, CDT
cycles on itself with a couple of other projects.
It's not perfect, but its better than nothing. At +1, we have EMF < UML
< OCL, and worse OCL depends on XText at +2. We survive, only one OCL
re-contribution in a couple of years.
Graphiti at +2, seems better.
Probably what would be better would be a better way to publicize API
changes that affect downstream builds. Don’t really have an answer
there but it is what causes problems. If APIs are well managed, in
theory, you can build before you’re dependencies do.
I think that it would be reasonable to very strongly recommend that
breaking API appear in an I-build a week before +0 so that nightly
builds should detect problems comfortably before the last minute.
Just a thought,
Doug.
From: <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of
"Wenz, Michael" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: Cross project issues <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, July 18, 2016 at 11:22 AM
To: Cross project issues <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Graphiti participating in Oxygen
David,
yes, you are right Graphiti is a framework. On the other hand we
have dependencies to GEF and EMF Transactions/Validation with is
at +2.
Graphiti has been on +3 since it joined the release train, so far
it has never been an issue. Or at least these issues did not reach
me.
In case any user of Graphiti struggles with this, this would be a
good time to speak up. I’m open towards changing to an earlier day
in case that is required.
Thanks,
Michael
*From:*[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
Of *David M Williams
*Sent:* Montag, 18. Juli 2016 16:25
*To:* Cross project issues <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject:* Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Graphiti participating
in Oxygen
I believe Graphiti is a "framework", right? To be used by others?
As such +3 does not make much sense. +3 is more for "leaf"
components that no one else depends on. +1 or +2 makes more sense
to me, depending on what you depend on.
As always, feel free to correct any misconceptions I have.
From: "Wenz, Michael" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: Cross project issues <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>,
Date: 07/18/2016 02:23 AM
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Graphiti participating in Oxygen
Sent by: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
Graphiti will be participating in Oxygen:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.graphiti/releases/0.14.0
Offset will be +3.
Michael_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
