Hi Eike

The reason for the increase is the addition of 
MUiFactory.createImperativeExpression(). I'm not convinced though  that 
MUiFactory is intended to be implemented by clients (only then the major 
version needs to be increased). An e4 expert has to comment on that.

Unfortunately, this change is in our repositories since March 1, so, 
decreasing the version now can also do harm to people and repositories. At 
any rate, before even considering that, we need to know whether MUiFactory 
is intended to be implemented by clients and if so, whether there's 
another way than adding a new method to it.

Dani



From:   Eike Stepper <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]
Date:   11.03.2017 09:19
Subject:        Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Problems with Simrel 
contribution
Sent by:        [email protected]



Hi,

It appears that https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/88492/ incremented the major 
version of the 
org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench plugin. There are some other commits in 
the context of 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=484398 but none of them 
seems to justify a major version increment. Maybe 
I overlooked something historic that justifies it. Is it justifiable that 
the major version of this plugin was 
incremented, and if so, what is the justification?

At this point it looks as if clients just need to increment their upper 
bound.

Cheers
/Eike

----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper



Am 11.03.2017 um 03:24 schrieb Evgeny Mandrikov:
> Hello,
>
> I'm forwarding the following thread of discussion since seems that 
previous messages were not delivered to the list - 
> "being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The 
reason it is being held: Too many recipients to 
> the message"
>
> And an update on subject:
> EclEmma has been re-enabled to unblock work of Andreas Sewe on 
https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/84521/
> Papyrus really seems to be a cause of a problem, because after 
re-enablement all builds are still green.
>
> Regards,
> Evgeny
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Evgeny Mandrikov <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
>>
> Date: Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Problems with Simrel contribution
> To: Grégoire DUPE <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
>>, Sravan K Lakkimsetti 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, 
[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected] <
mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected] <
mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected] <
mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected] <
mailto:[email protected]> 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, 
[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
>>, 
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected] <
mailto:[email protected]> 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, 
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, 
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, 
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, Frederic 
Gurr <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc: Cross project issues <[email protected] <
mailto:[email protected]>>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> FWIW I come to exactly the same conclusion.
> And so tried to confirm by re-enabling EclEmma - 
https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/92766/ , validation build successful - 
> 
https://hudson.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.oxygen.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/391/console

>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:24 PM Grégoire DUPE <[email protected] <
mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     It?s looks like that the problem comes from 
?org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widgets? which has the following dependency
>     : org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench [1.2.0,2.0.0) (cf. the error 
message at the end of this e-mail)
>
>     Can anybody from Papyrus check that ?
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Grégoire
>
>     Cannot complete the install because of a conflicting dependency.
>
>     Software being installed: validationSet_main 1.0.0
>
>     Only one of the following can be installed at once: 
[org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 2.0.0.v20170228-1842,
>     org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 1.3.0.v20170105-1239]
>
>     Cannot satisfy dependency: 
mappedRepo_download.eclipse.org_eclipse_updates_4.7milestones_S-4.7M6-201703082000
>     1.0.0 depends on: org.eclipse.platform.ide 0.0.0
>
>     Cannot satisfy dependency: 
mappedRepo_download.eclipse.org_modeling_mdt_papyrus_updates_milestones_3.0_M5_main
>     1.0.0 depends on: org.eclipse.papyrus.sdk.feature.feature.group 
3.0.0
>
>     Cannot satisfy dependency: 
org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widget.feature.feature.group 3.0.0.201702011724 
depends on:
>     org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widgets [3.0.0.201702011724]
>
>     Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widgets 
3.0.0.201702011724 depends on: bundle
>     org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench [1.2.0,2.0.0)
>
>     Cannot satisfy dependency: 
org.eclipse.papyrus.sdk.feature.feature.group 3.0.0.201702011724 depends 
on:
>     org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widget.feature.feature.group 
[3.0.0.201702011724]
>
>     Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.platform.feature.group 
4.7.0.v20170308-2000 depends on: org.eclipse.ui.ide
>     [3.13.0.v20170306-1626]
>
>     Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.platform.ide 
4.7.0.I20170308-2000 depends on:
>     org.eclipse.platform.feature.group [4.7.0.v20170308-2000]
>
>     Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.ui.ide 3.13.0.v20170306-1626 
depends on: bundle
>     org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench [2.0.0,3.0.0)
>
>     Cannot satisfy dependency: validationSet_main 1.0.0 depends on:
> 
mappedRepo_download.eclipse.org_eclipse_updates_4.7milestones_S-4.7M6-201703082000
 
[1.0.0]
>
>     Cannot satisfy dependency: validationSet_main 1.0.0 depends on:
> 
mappedRepo_download.eclipse.org_modeling_mdt_papyrus_updates_milestones_3.0_M5_main
 
[1.0.0]
>
>     Only one of the following can be installed at once:
>
>       Eclipse Workbench Model 2.0.0.v20170228-1842 
(org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 2.0.0.v20170228-1842)
>
>       Eclipse Workbench Model 1.3.0.v20170105-1239 
(org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 1.3.0.v20170105-1239)
>
>     bundle(org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 2.0.0.v20170228-1842) is 
required by:
>
>     ValidationSet(main)
>
>     Contribution(Eclipse)
>
>     MappedRepository(
http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.7milestones/S-4.7M6-201703082000/
)
>
>     Product(org.eclipse.platform.ide)
>
>     InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.platform.feature.group 
4.7.0.v20170308-2000)
>
>     InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.ui.ide 3.13.0.v20170306-1626)
>
>     bundle(org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 1.3.0.v20170105-1239) is 
required by:
>
>     ValidationSet(main)
>
>     Contribution(Papyrus)
>
>     MappedRepository(
http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/papyrus/updates/milestones/3.0/M5/main
)
>
>     Feature(org.eclipse.papyrus.sdk.feature.feature.group 3.0.0)
>
> InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widget.feature.feature.group 
3.0.0.201702011724)
>
>     InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widgets 
3.0.0.201702011724)
>
>     *De :* Sravan K Lakkimsetti [mailto:[email protected] <
mailto:[email protected]>]
>     *Envoyé :* vendredi 10 mars 2017 11:33
>     *À :* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>;
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>;
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>;
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; 
Grégoire DUPE <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected] <
mailto:[email protected]>;
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>;
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Frederic 
Gurr <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     *Objet :* Problems with Simrel contribution
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I am doing simrel contribution for 4.7 M6 for platform and equinox. 
During this process. I found that the
>     following projects are not compatible anymore. I have disabled these 
projects with my contribution. My request is
>     to re-enable them during your contribution to 4.7 M6.
>
>     The projects that were disabled.
>
>      1. EclEmma
>      2. ECP
>      3. EMF CDO
>      4. EMF COMPARE
>      5. EMF Parsley
>      6. MoDisco
>      7. Papyrus
>      8. Sphinx
>
>     Thanks and Regards,
>
>     Sravan
>
>     Sravan Kumar Lakkimsetti
>
>     IBM India Pvt Ltd,
>
>     Embassy Golf Links Business Park, D Block,
>
>     Off Indiranagar-Kormangla Inner Ring Road,
>
>     Bangalore - 560071, India
>
>     Phone: 91-80-41776858
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe 
from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe 
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev





_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to