Jonah, thanks for taking care of this. If we will revert it after RedDeer
is pushed, I think it is safe to give it a try. Also, If Jetty should be
built somewhere with a fix it might provide a space for updating all deps
in all project, though, in quite late time.

Thanks

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:45 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote:

> Hi Ondre/Nitin,
>
> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181738
> decouples the reddeer contribution from webtools which means if you think
> it is ok you can merge that so reddeer can be merged.
>
> Thanks
> Jonah
>
>
>
>
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:25, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ondrej,
>>
>> AFAICT the problem is that WTP is also pulling in org.slf4j 2.0 from
>> reddeer.
>>
>> 15:53:01 [0]Missing requirement: Jetty :: JNDI Naming 10.0.4
>> (org.eclipse.jetty.jndi 10.0.4) requires 'java.package; org.slf4j
>> [2.0.0,3.0.0)' but it could not be found
>>
>> So because you are (correctly) removing slf4j 2.0, it is unintentionally
>> breaking WTP.
>>
>> Nitin is working on fixing up the WTP contribution. I don't think there
>> is actually anything wrong with reddeer's contribution, we just need a
>> resolution of WTP first.
>>
>> I will push a patch that verifies the above in a moment.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jonah
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ~~~
>> Jonah Graham
>> Kichwa Coders
>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this
>>> time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can
>>> be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my
>>> side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle
>>> this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed.
>>>
>>> I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in
>>> release, not sure if that can help.
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console
>>> [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ondrej,
>>>>
>>>> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2
>>>> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from
>>>> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer.
>>>>
>>>> Markus,
>>>>
>>>> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you
>>>> mean that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many
>>>> projects, then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp,
>>>> and reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06
>>>> release entirely.
>>>>
>>>> Nitin,
>>>>
>>>> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is
>>>> still publishing slf4j 2.0.
>>>>
>>>> Jonah
>>>> ~~~
>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP
>>>>> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I
>>>>> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]:
>>>>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer <
>>>>> mkna...@eclipsesource.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially
>>>>>> because the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2
>>>>>> repository for building. I will try that now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is
>>>>>> now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Markus
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution*
>>>>>>> (Thanks Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done 
>>>>>>> that I
>>>>>>> don't know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means
>>>>>>> that Eclipse Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
>>>>>>> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
>>>>>>> jetty 10 from other sources.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
>>>>>>> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
>>>>>>> please.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
>>>>>>> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2
>>>>>>> contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel
>>>>>>> output repo!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>> Jonah
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~~~
>>>>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to