I'm doing a build against the 10.0.5 snapshot. The corresponding WTP jetty site has been updated to not have the SLF4J API bundle in it. Yesterday we added the 10.0.4 site to the webtools.aggrcon to provide the slf4j 2.0.0 alpha1 and unblock others; should I remove that from the aggrcon file now so that we're not contributing that and 10.0.4 any more, or wait to do it until after your test, Jonah?
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 1:52 PM Markus Knauer <mkna...@eclipsesource.com> wrote: > We (RAP) are consuming the Jetty bundles from WTP ( > https://download.eclipse.org/webtools/jetty/...), and of course, other > bundles from Platform. > Therefore I'd like to wait until we can get the updated bundles from > there. If the update appears in the next hours, I can trigger new RAP > builds. > > Thanks > Markus > > > On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 18:49, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> Sravan has provided me with a link to what should represent Platform's >> contribution based on the jetty snapshot. >> >> I don't think we need to wait for a respin of the snapshot for the source >> bundle issue that Sravan identified. >> >> If other projects (RAP / Webtools/ Reddeer) can do the same, or provide >> me with build instructions I can smoke test the integration of everything >> in SimRel/EPP and make sure it all looks good and try to report back to >> Jetty so they can make their release. >> >> Thanks >> Jonah >> ~~~ >> Jonah Graham >> Kichwa Coders >> www.kichwacoders.com >> >> >> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 12:26, Sravan K Lakkimsetti < >> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote: >> >>> Triggered a platform build with latest 10.0.5-SNAPSHOT. But there is >>> issue in the source bundles as they contain temporary files >>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858764165 >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Sravan >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>> *Sent:* 10 June 2021 21:36 >>> *To:* Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> >>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED >>> from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the >>> status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The snapshot is ready >>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858733158 >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jonah >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 10:23 Jonah Graham, <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> >>> >>> We are making very good progress on resolving this issue, in no part >>> thanks to everyone that has been super responsive in updating their bits. >>> >>> >>> >>> I checked all the EPP packages and (as expected) only JEE has >>> slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.jar. All the packages (also as expected) >>> have org.slf4j.api_1.7.30.v20200204-2150.jar (including JEE). >>> >>> >>> >>> The Jetty project is just about to push out a snapshot ( >>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6390) of 10.0.5 that >>> fully resolves the slf4j 2.0.0 alpha1 dependency so that the SimRel and JEE >>> package won't have alpha1 jar anymore. >>> >>> >>> >>> To reduce the change of a turnaround time again we can collectively test >>> that the 10.0.5 snapshot resolves all the issues. Note that this a further >>> 10.0.5 snapshot than we had yesterday. >>> >>> >>> >>> RIght now, I don't know how to do this test without a full respin of >>> everything (platform , redeer(?) , webtools, rap). >>> >>> >>> >>> Any suggestions are very welcome. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jonah >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ~~~ >>> Jonah Graham >>> Kichwa Coders >>> www.kichwacoders.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:56, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> Jonah, thanks for taking care of this. If we will revert it after >>> RedDeer is pushed, I think it is safe to give it a try. Also, If Jetty >>> should be built somewhere with a fix it might provide a space for updating >>> all deps in all project, though, in quite late time. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:45 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ondre/Nitin, >>> >>> >>> >>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181738 >>> decouples the reddeer contribution from webtools which means if you think >>> it is ok you can merge that so reddeer can be merged. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jonah >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ~~~ >>> Jonah Graham >>> Kichwa Coders >>> www.kichwacoders.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:25, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ondrej, >>> >>> >>> >>> AFAICT the problem is that WTP is also pulling in org.slf4j 2.0 from >>> reddeer. >>> >>> >>> >>> 15:53:01 [0]Missing requirement: Jetty :: JNDI Naming 10.0.4 >>> (org.eclipse.jetty.jndi 10.0.4) requires 'java.package; org.slf4j >>> [2.0.0,3.0.0)' but it could not be found >>> >>> >>> >>> So because you are (correctly) removing slf4j 2.0, it is unintentionally >>> breaking WTP. >>> >>> >>> >>> Nitin is working on fixing up the WTP contribution. I don't think there >>> is actually anything wrong with reddeer's contribution, we just need a >>> resolution of WTP first. >>> >>> >>> >>> I will push a patch that verifies the above in a moment. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jonah >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ~~~ >>> Jonah Graham >>> Kichwa Coders >>> www.kichwacoders.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this >>> time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can >>> be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my >>> side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle >>> this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed. >>> >>> I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in >>> release, not sure if that can help. >>> >>> [1]: >>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console >>> >>> [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Ondrej, >>> >>> >>> >>> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2 >>> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from >>> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer. >>> >>> >>> >>> Markus, >>> >>> >>> >>> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you mean >>> that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many projects, >>> then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp, and >>> reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 release >>> entirely. >>> >>> >>> >>> Nitin, >>> >>> >>> >>> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is >>> still publishing slf4j 2.0. >>> >>> >>> >>> Jonah >>> >>> ~~~ >>> Jonah Graham >>> Kichwa Coders >>> www.kichwacoders.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP >>> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I >>> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right? >>> >>> >>> >>> [1]: >>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer <mkna...@eclipsesource.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially because >>> the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2 repository for >>> building. I will try that now. >>> >>> >>> >>> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is >>> now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to >>> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Markus >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> >>> >>> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks >>> Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't >>> know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that Eclipse >>> Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version. >>> >>> >>> >>> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel >>> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or >>> jetty 10 from other sources. >>> >>> >>> >>> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to >>> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel >>> please. >>> >>> >>> >>> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has >>> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2 >>> contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output >>> repo! >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Jonah >>> >>> >>> ~~~ >>> Jonah Graham >>> Kichwa Coders >>> www.kichwacoders.com >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > -- Regards, Nitin Dahyabhai Eclipse WTP PMC
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
