Venu,

The machine is just a little Intel PC that was given to me.  It's the only PC I 
have that passed the hardware test.  No drivers were needed to run OpenSolaris 
on the box.  What's the best way for me to send you the specs of the box?  I'll 
also try using your settings on my box to see what happens.

Thank you very much,

-Cesar

On Dec 15, 2009, at 5:30 PM, venugopal iyer wrote:

> 
> Sorry, Cesar, for the delayed response.
> 
> I tried setting up your scenario on a recent version
> (build 130) and see that the bandwidth is close to what I am
> setting.
> 
> # flowadm show-flowprop tcp-flow
> FLOW         PROPERTY        VALUE          DEFAULT        POSSIBLE
> tcp-flow     maxbw               1.200      --             1200K tcp-flow     
> priority        --             --             ?
> 
> 
> # wget 10.0.0.2/myfile.dat
> --2009-12-15 15:47:24--  http://10.0.0.2/myfile.dat
> Connecting to 10.0.0.2:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 46104240 (44M) [text/plain]
> Saving to: `myfile.dat.4'
> 
> 100%[======================================>] 46,104,240   160K/s   in 4m 42s
> 
> 2009-12-15 15:52:05 (160 KB/s) - `myfile.dat.4' saved [46104240/46104240]
> 
> 160 KB/s  is 1.280 Mbps.
> 
> I see this consistently.
> 
> 
> The kstat does give me slightly higher about 1.3 Mbps.
> 
> FYI, without the flow (with limt) in place, I see
> 
> # wget 10.0.0.2/myfile.dat
> --2009-12-15 15:47:12--  http://10.0.0.2/myfile.dat
> Connecting to 10.0.0.2:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 46104240 (44M) [text/plain]
> Saving to: `myfile.dat.3'
> 
> 100%[======================================>] 46,104,240  78.2M/s   in 0.6s
> 
> 2009-12-15 15:47:13 (78.2 MB/s) - `myfile.dat.3' saved [46104240/46104240]
> 
> 
> What kind of hardware are you using?
> 
> -venu
> 
> 
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Cesar Delgado wrote:
> 
>> Venu,
>> 
>> Any new information on this?  Is it a bug?
>> 
>> -Cesar
>> 
>> On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:39 PM, venugopal iyer wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi, Cesar:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Cesar Delgado wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 25, 2009, at 2:05 PM, venugopal iyer wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Cesar Delgado wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Venu,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2009, at 9:49 AM, venugopal iyer wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi, Cesar:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Cesar Delgado wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Venugopal,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm sorry if these sounds like basic questions.  I really appreciate 
>>>>>>>> the patience and the help.  Replies in-line.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 9:29 AM, venugopal iyer wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi, Cesar:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Cesar Delgado wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'm setting up a server to go to a hosting site where I have a 1Mbps 
>>>>>>>>>> pipe.  From what I read I know I can't set the limit to this as the 
>>>>>>>>>> lowest setting is ~1.2Mbps and this is something that's getting 
>>>>>>>>>> worked on in Crossbow2.  I am seeing some strange behavior.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> FIrst I have a question on flowadm's show-usage command.  When I try 
>>>>>>>>>> to run show-prop with the name of a flow I get an error.  The flow 
>>>>>>>>>> exists.  What am I doing wrong?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> root at myhost:~# flowadm show-usage -f /var/log/net.log http-flow
>>>>>>>>>> flowadm: invalid flow: '(null)'
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> This is a bug, I have submitted
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 6904427 flowadm show-usage doesn't work with a flow name
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks for submitting that.  I haven't been able to find a link to the 
>>>>>>>> bugtracker for Crossbow.  Could you please send me the URL?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think it should show up on
>>>>>>> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/index.jsp soon.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Ok, now for my problem.  I have the following setting:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> root at myhost:~# flowadm show-flowprop http-flow
>>>>>>>>>> FLOW         PROPERTY        VALUE          DEFAULT        POSSIBLE
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    maxbw               1.228      --             1228k
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    priority        medium         --             medium
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I ran a test hitting the webserver and I see this:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I have the following flow
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> # flowadm show-flow FLOW        LINK        IPADDR                   
>>>>>>>>> PROTO  LPORT   RPORT   DSFLD
>>>>>>>>> tcp-flow    <link>      --                       tcp    --      --    
>>>>>>>>>   --
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> # flowadm show-flowprop tcp-flow
>>>>>>>>> FLOW         PROPERTY        VALUE          DEFAULT        POSSIBLE
>>>>>>>>> tcp-flow     maxbw               1.228      --             1228K 
>>>>>>>>> tcp-flow     priority        --             --             ?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> When I send TCP traffic (am using a traffic generator - netperf, to
>>>>>>>>> this machine from a peer) for about 2 mins.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On the peer the traffic generator (sender) says I am capped to about
>>>>>>>>> 1.14 Mbps.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput bytes  bytes   bytes    
>>>>>>>>> secs.    10^6bits/sec
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 49152  49152  49152    120.49      1.14
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Now, when I try show-usage during the traffic flow on
>>>>>>>>> the machine with the above flow in place (receiver), I am seeing:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> # flowadm show-usage -s 11/24/2009 -f /var/tmp/tcpflow
>>>>>>>>> FLOW         START         END           RBYTES   OBYTES   BANDWIDTH
>>>>>>>>> tcp-flow     08:51:48      08:52:08      3428658  107802       1.414 
>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>> tcp-flow     08:52:08      08:52:28      3431198  107802       1.415 
>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>> tcp-flow     08:52:28      08:52:48      3434614  107888       1.417 
>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>> tcp-flow     08:52:48      08:53:08      3443298  107802       1.420 
>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>> tcp-flow     08:53:08      08:53:28      3444324  107802       1.420 
>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>> tcp-flow     08:53:28      08:53:48      1376806  43576    0.568 Mbps
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I think the difference you see is likely to be because of the time
>>>>>>>>> period when the stats are written to the file (the bandwidth is 
>>>>>>>>> computed for every 20 seconds period which might not be exactly in
>>>>>>>>> sync with the bandwidth enforcement period in the kernel) and also
>>>>>>>>> could be because of rounding up etc. But, if you look at the  entire
>>>>>>>>> duration, it averages to about the configured limit (in the above
>>>>>>>>> example, I think it is about 1.275 Mbps for the 2 min duration)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The way I'm testing it is setting up Apache and then moving down a 
>>>>>>>> file with `wget`.  The use case for this machine is an Apache based 
>>>>>>>> app that serves large files to customers.  That is why I think a 
>>>>>>>> `wget` is more telling of "real" performance than netperf.  I'm 
>>>>>>>> running the test again and on the client side I am seeing usage over 
>>>>>>>> the maxbw limit I have set.  `wget` is reporting about 2Mbps transfer 
>>>>>>>> rate which is much closer to what I was seeing in the show-usage 
>>>>>>>> statistics.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [cdelgado at Bluegene tmp]$ wget sol/myfile.dat
>>>>>>>> --10:01:30--  http://sol/myfile.dat
>>>>>>>> Resolving sol... 192.168.69.104
>>>>>>>> Connecting to sol|192.168.69.104|:80... connected.
>>>>>>>> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
>>>>>>>> Length: 1048576000 (1000M)
>>>>>>>> Saving to: `myfile.dat'
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 5% [==>                                                      ] 
>>>>>>>> 55,530,974   267K/s  eta 60m 44s
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> BTW, setting a maxbw for a link (dladm) doesn't really impact the
>>>>>>>>> flow as the bandwidth for both are independent.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thank you for this clarification but I still don't understand how I 
>>>>>>>> can be seeing ~2Mbps transfer if both the link and the flow are both 
>>>>>>>> capped at 1.2Mbps.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Can you try with a higher bandwidth, say 100 Mbps and see what the 
>>>>>>> results
>>>>>>> are when compared to wget's output?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Also, another way of manually checking would be to do a
>>>>>>>         # kstat -c flow -n http-flow
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> before and after the wget run and see how many bytes (rbytes) the
>>>>>>> kernel has seen for that flow (assuming there isn't any other traffic
>>>>>>> going over the flow), and then determine the bandwidth (you might need
>>>>>>> to get the duration of the wget run pretty close to get the
>>>>>>> right bandwdith value).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -venu
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I changed the flow to be 100Mbps.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> root at myhost:/tmp# flowadm show-flowprop -p maxbw http-flow
>>>>>> FLOW         PROPERTY        VALUE          DEFAULT        POSSIBLE
>>>>>> http-flow    maxbw             100          --             100
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I also removed the maxbw=1.228 I had set on the link.  When I changed 
>>>>>> this value on the link I lost all network to the machine.  Had to go in 
>>>>>> and manually reboot it.  The network came up fine.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I created two files one before wget and one after with no other network 
>>>>>> traffic except the ssh session.  I created a 1 GB file to transfer.  The 
>>>>>> output is a bit confusing to me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> root at myhost:/tmp# ls http-flow-*
>>>>>> http-flow-1.txt  http-flow-2.txt
>>>>>> root at myhost:/tmp# cat http-flow-*
>>>>>> module: unix                            instance: 0
>>>>>> name:   http-flow                       class:    flow
>>>>>>  crtime                          188662.418688816
>>>>>>  ierrors                         0
>>>>>>  ipackets                        4680
>>>>>>  obytes                          182520974
>>>>>>  oerrors                         0
>>>>>>  opackets                        127521
>>>>>>  rbytes                          308138
>>>>>>  snaptime                        189431.882363589
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> module: unix                            instance: 0
>>>>>> name:   http-flow                       class:    flow
>>>>>>  crtime                          188662.418688816
>>>>>>  ierrors                         0
>>>>>>  ipackets                        31262
>>>>>>  obytes                          1281785975
>>>>>>  oerrors                         0
>>>>>>  opackets                        895533
>>>>>>  rbytes                          2062678
>>>>>>  snaptime                        189595.122347726
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So this means the network only passed ~1.6 MB of data?
>>>>> 
>>>>> is this on the outbound side or inbound?
>>>>> 
>>>>> looks like it has a total of 8794120008 bits in the outbound side 
>>>>> (obytes) and 14036320 bits on the inbound (rbytes). What is the duration
>>>>> 93 seconds? So the outbound would be ~94 Mbps and inbound 150 Kbps.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry, outbound.  I was looking at the wrong row.  With the flow set at 50 
>>>> I'm getting getting ~37 Mbps.  In my mind the flow is not respecting the 
>>>> value I'm giving it.  With the maxbw set to 100 I could get ~80 Mbps and 
>>>> now I'm only seeing ~37Mbps.   Could it be something in the way Crossbow 
>>>> is averaging the actually bits and bytes going down the pipe or is it me 
>>>> not understanding the system?
>>> 
>>> For TCP you might get a little less than the set bandwidth as TCP
>>> would do flow control too (i.e if for bandwidth reasons ACKs come back
>>> slower or packets get dropped, TCP will react and will slow down). Also,
>>> note that the current property (maxbw) is a *limit* which means we will
>>> ensure that the flow will not get *more* than what you have asked for.
>>> Going forwards we are looking at adding guarantee where in the flow would
>>> get what it asked for.
>>> 
>>> -venu
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> root at myhost:/tmp# flowadm show-flowprop http-flow
>>>> FLOW         PROPERTY        VALUE          DEFAULT        POSSIBLE
>>>> http-flow    maxbw              50          --             50
>>>> http-flow    priority        medium         --             medium
>>>> 
>>>> root at myhost:/tmp# cat http-flow-*
>>>> module: unix                            instance: 0
>>>> name:   http-flow                       class:    flow
>>>>    crtime                          188662.418688816
>>>>    ierrors                         0
>>>>    ipackets                        32346
>>>>    obytes                          1300129135
>>>>    oerrors                         0
>>>>    opackets                        908351
>>>>    rbytes                          2133486
>>>>    snaptime                        191261.607310645
>>>> 
>>>> module: unix                            instance: 0
>>>> name:   http-flow                       class:    flow
>>>>    crtime                          188662.418688816
>>>>    ierrors                         0
>>>>    ipackets                        85361
>>>>    obytes                          2399401106
>>>>    oerrors                         0
>>>>    opackets                        1676468
>>>>    rbytes                          5632604
>>>>    snaptime                        192621.873203347
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> [cdelgado at Bluegene tmp]$ time wget sol/myfile.dat
>>>> --13:52:20--  http://sol/myfile.dat
>>>> Resolving sol... 192.168.69.104
>>>> Connecting to sol|192.168.69.104|:80... connected.
>>>> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
>>>> Length: 1048576000 (1000M)
>>>> Saving to: `myfile.dat'
>>>> 
>>>> 100%[==========================================================>] 
>>>> 1,048,576,000 4.06M/s   in 3m 44s
>>>> 
>>>> 13:56:04 (4.46 MB/s) - `myfile.dat' saved [1048576000/1048576000]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> real       3m44.364s
>>>> user       0m1.042s
>>>> sys        0m24.065s
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The wget command was telling me it was getting ~80Mbps which is under 
>>>>>> the threshold of the flow.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [cdelgado at Bluegene tmp]$ time wget sol/myfile.dat
>>>>>> --13:21:49--  http://sol/myfile.dat
>>>>>> Resolving sol... 192.168.69.104
>>>>>> Connecting to sol|192.168.69.104|:80... connected.
>>>>>> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
>>>>>> Length: 1048576000 (1000M)
>>>>>> Saving to: `myfile.dat'
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 100%[==========================================================>] 
>>>>>> 1,048,576,000 10.5M/s   in 93s
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 13:23:23 (10.7 MB/s) - `myfile.dat' saved [1048576000/1048576000]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> real     1m33.701s
>>>>>> user     0m0.899s
>>>>>> sys      0m23.874s
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Maybe a value of 100Mbps is too high for this machine.  I might try with 
>>>>>> 50Mbps to see what wget says.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> OK,
>>>>> 
>>>>> -venu
>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Cesar
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> root at myhost:~# flowadm show-usage -s 11/23/2009,01:32:22 -e 
>>>>>>>>>> 11/23/2009,01:46:22 -f /var/log/net.log | grep -v "0 Mbps\|^FLOW"
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:32:22      01:32:42      1512     2571     0.001 Mbps
>>>>>>>>>> ssh-flow     01:32:42      01:33:02      1818     3578     0.002 Mbps
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:33:02      01:33:22      66917    3165136      1.292 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> ssh-flow     01:33:02      01:33:22      3618     5344     0.003 Mbps
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:33:22      01:33:42      117947   5713018      2.332 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> ssh-flow     01:33:22      01:33:42      4182     3020     0.002 Mbps
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:33:42      01:34:02      118998   5685520      2.321 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> ssh-flow     01:33:42      01:34:02      11616    9924     0.008 Mbps
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:34:02      01:34:22      117084   5725664      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:34:22      01:34:42      119130   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:34:42      01:35:02      114180   5725168      2.335 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:35:02      01:35:22      109230   5725664      2.333 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:35:22      01:35:42      116160   5725168      2.336 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:35:42      01:36:02      119262   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:36:02      01:36:22      119196   5725664      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:36:22      01:36:42      117216   5725168      2.336 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:36:42      01:37:02      119394   5722636      2.336 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:37:02      01:37:22      119526   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:37:22      01:37:42      119460   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:37:42      01:38:02      119460   5725664      2.338 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:38:02      01:38:22      119724   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:38:22      01:38:42      119724   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:38:42      01:39:02      119130   5722636      2.336 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:39:02      01:39:22      118866   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:39:22      01:39:42      116490   5725664      2.336 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:39:42      01:40:02      119790   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:40:02      01:40:22      117678   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:40:22      01:40:42      118668   5725664      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:40:42      01:41:02      117414   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:41:02      01:41:22      119790   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:41:22      01:41:42      119813   5720510      2.336 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:41:42      01:42:02      119394   5725664      2.338 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:42:02      01:42:22      119724   5722272      2.336 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:42:22      01:42:42      119526   5725664      2.338 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:42:42      01:43:02      119196   5722140      2.336 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:43:02      01:43:22      119394   5725664      2.338 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:43:22      01:43:42      119658   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:43:42      01:44:02      119064   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:44:02      01:44:22      113256   5676668      2.315 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> ssh-flow     01:44:02      01:44:22      18414    49646    0.027 Mbps
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:44:22      01:44:42      118206   5725664      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:44:42      01:45:02      117282   5722140      2.335 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> ssh-flow     01:44:42      01:45:02      4698     3544     0.003 Mbps
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:45:02      01:45:22      118536   5688284      2.322 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> ssh-flow     01:45:02      01:45:22      4092     3198     0.002 Mbps
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:45:22      01:45:42      119130   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> ssh-flow     01:45:22      01:45:42      1980     1478     0.001 Mbps
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> That's above the flow's maxbw parameter.  After that I tried to 
>>>>>>>>>> change the  maxbw of the link with dladm and that brought the 
>>>>>>>>>> bandwidth down but still not down to 1.2 Mbps.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> root at myhost:~# dladm show-linkprop -p maxbw e1000g0
>>>>>>>>>> LINK         PROPERTY        PERM VALUE          DEFAULT        
>>>>>>>>>> POSSIBLE
>>>>>>>>>> e1000g0      maxbw           rw       1.228      --             --
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> root at myhost:~# flowadm show-usage -s 11/23/2009,01:46:02 -e 
>>>>>>>>>> 11/23/2009,01:46:22 -f /var/log/net.log | grep -v "0 Mbps\|^FLOW"
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:46:02      01:46:22      119394   5725168      2.337 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> ssh-flow     01:46:02      01:46:22      4680     2980     0.003 Mbps
>>>>>>>>>> http-flow    01:46:22      01:46:42      94314    4520316      1.845 
>>>>>>>>>> Mbp
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas or is there a subtlety that I'm missing and the behavior 
>>>>>>>>>> is correct?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the help.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> -Cesar
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> crossbow-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> crossbow-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/crossbow-discuss
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to