And so says Kevin Rudat on 21/08/05 14:26...
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 09:53:43PM -0700, Mark Wedel wrote:
>> On the one hand, crossedit is basically obsoleted, so I don't want to 
>> spend a bunch of time and resources maintaining it.
>>
>> On the other, if people want to do so, who am I to say don't do it.
> I was thinking/hoping you'd say something like that. =)

Personally, I like crossedit better.  May be my allergy to all things
java in general.  If you want to maintain it, more power to you.  If you
want to re-do it in gtk2, I might even step up to help.

> I wanted to know if there's any objections to the changes, so I don't spend
> time composing patches that won't be used.
> 
> I mean, objections to each idea, rather than issues discovered when
> reviewing a patch itself.

I basically agree with all of them, except the "Display only certain
things", which I don't really understand, so I'm neutral.  But my
opinion doesn't really count much :-) just an user.

best,
                                               Lalo Martins
--
      So many of our dreams at first seem impossible,
       then they seem improbable, and then, when we
       summon the will, they soon become inevitable.
--
http://www.exoweb.net/                  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNU: never give up freedom                 http://www.gnu.org/


_______________________________________________
crossfire mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire

Reply via email to