> > Does anyone else think that putting the source files into SVN is a good > > idea, or just extra clutter? > > Sounds like a good idea.
Agreed on that. Having all the sources is nice, and makes it easier to fix things later on :) > The Gimp's xcf is a good contender. However, it is also true that there are > many artists who are using Photoshop, Painter, or Open Canvas; so I'd > suggest not defining any specific file format, and let each artist use > whatever he prefers. Agreed, many formats can be used. Of course open formats should be encouraged when possible :) > Maybe it would be nice to put those elsewhere than in the arch subdir, so > that artists who wouldn't require the rest can only download those, and > non-artists can grab the arches without the (possibly heavy) graphic > "source" files that would be of no use for them ? Agreed on that too, maybe put in a arch_src tree duplicating the arch structure? Nicolas -- http://nicolas.weeger.org [Petit site d'images, de textes, de code, bref de l'aléatoire !]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ crossfire mailing list crossfire@metalforge.org http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
