-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 This sounds nice, would this be a 2.0 client or a branch/1.x client?
As far as I can see you are suggesting separate releases of server/maps/arch and client? Is that correct? I see no need to keep them synced apart from making sure last stable client and stable server work with each other. Regards, Arvid Norlander Kevin R. Bulgrien wrote: | Speaking of releases... It sure would be nice to see the libglade client | packaged up after spending all that time working on it and debugging it. | The original GTK V2 client was released far sooner and buggier. Another | two cents that's not worth much in a free project, is that a client | release would be a heck of a lot easier and faster than rebalancing, | albeit not as much fun for the releaser. | | I've already toyed around a bit with glade3 and the client layouts. | with thoughts of resuming development some time. No reason to | artificially keep that client out of distribution. I'm not | ready to start using the other client. | | Kevin Bulgrien -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREKAAYFAkh/fcsACgkQWmK6ng/aMNm9FQCfWiCIFS75nF9lBIx7BUancyCx Jh0An3s2rCmH1ioJYPB9F/oYkHl67w/7 =4iql -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ crossfire mailing list crossfire@metalforge.org http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire