> -----Original Message----- > From: crosswalk-dev-boun...@lists.crosswalk-project.org > [mailto:crosswalk-dev-boun...@lists.crosswalk-project.org] On Behalf Of > Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 7:07 PM > To: Kubo Da Costa, Raphael > Cc: crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org > Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev] tizen-extensions-crosswalk versioning > > Hi Raphael, > > I don't think we need to tie it with Crosswalk version (and possibly never). > The C API t-e-c is built on (Crosswalk Extension C API) is pretty stable, so > they > are mostly independent. > > I rather keep t-e-c in "rolling release" mode for a while longer (so > incrementing minor and keeping 0 as major) is fine by me. At some point > (maybe the same time we do Crosswalk 3 branch) we can branch de t-e-c to > 1 and make it folow the same approach as Crosswalk (wrt to branches and > such). > > What do you think? > Would that work out for QA team as well?
It should work, as long as it is clear to the QA team which version they need to pick when they start their weekly testing. From this discussion it seems it would be the latest available on the day the test starts. And of course the extensions package needs to work with the beta release. Francesco --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Finland Oy Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4 Domiciled in Helsinki This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. _______________________________________________ Crosswalk-dev mailing list Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev
