Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.olive...@intel.com> writes: > (This is a bit offtopic wrt the original thread, I think all matters > regarding t-e-c are agreed :) > >> >> Given that Canary builds are intended as a development aide, publication >> >> of >> >> a binary for one platform should not be hinged on whether the Canary >> >> successfully builds for all platforms. >> > >> > Agreed. >> >> Just to confirm: you don't mean we're supposed to have a new android >> crosswalk canary if the tizen canary build (excluding t-e-c) fails (or >> vice-versa), right? > > The idea was not to bump Canary only if all platforms pass. So if one > day, Android breaks, we would ship the Canary for Tizen and the build > error for Android and bump the version.
While this is technically possible, it goes in the opposite direction of what we've been doing so far and what we've agreed upon: it's just somewhat upsetting to change the rules in the middle of the game (and it wouldn't be the first time). So if this is to be done, I would like everyone to really read this thread and agree once and for all. _______________________________________________ Crosswalk-dev mailing list Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev
