+1 On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Pozdnyakov, Mikhail <mikhail.pozdnya...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > So far there are two ways of launching an application in XWalk: > > 1) Rely on main document as application entry point (according > http://anssiko.github.io/runtime/app-lifecycle.html). > 2) Load page from "app.launch.local_path" > > I propose to remove option #2 for the following reasons: > > 1) The "app.launch.local_path" code path does not initialize "main document". > However, a lot of XWalk functionality relies (and newly added functionality > will rely) on having main document (for instance non-persistent main document > implementation or onSuspend event support). This will cause various bugs if > an application is launched from "app.launch.local_path". > 2) Supporting of two application launch paths makes the runtime logic too > complicated and increases potential bugs likelihood. > > WDYT? > > There is a concern that QA currently might use "app.launch.local_path" in > their test cases, so I'd like to hear a response from them. > > BR, > Mikhail > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Finland Oy > Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki > Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4 > Domiciled in Helsinki > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > > _______________________________________________ > Crosswalk-dev mailing list > Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org > https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev
-- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆ _______________________________________________ Crosswalk-dev mailing list Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev
