It's a known issue.
We must firstly support to load a web page(app) from a local path(or url). 
This is typical usage for many web apps like Cordova based web apps. 
This is needed by XDK. So obviously it's our first priority.

Yongsheng

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pozdnyakov, Mikhail
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 5:30 PM
> To: Zhu, Yongsheng; crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org
> Cc: Poussa, Sakari; Balestrieri, Francesco
> Subject: RE: Remove "application launch from local path" support
> 
> Hi Yongsheng,
> 
> This probably means that batch of functionality (related to application life 
> cycle)
> does not work for Android. Is it a known issue?
> 
> Could you please describe the reasons why the item #1 is not (cannot) 
> supported
> on Android?
> 
> BR,
> Mikhail
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Zhu, Yongsheng
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 2:53 AM
> To: Pozdnyakov, Mikhail; crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org
> Subject: RE: Remove "application launch from local path" support
> 
> The first item is not supported on Android. So I don't agree to remove it at 
> least
> for Android now.
> 
> Yongsheng
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Crosswalk-dev
> > [mailto:crosswalk-dev-boun...@lists.crosswalk-project.org]
> > On Behalf Of Pozdnyakov, Mikhail
> > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 6:24 PM
> > To: crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org
> > Subject: [Crosswalk-dev] Remove "application launch from local path"
> > support
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > So far there are two ways of launching an application in XWalk:
> >
> > 1) Rely on main document as application entry point (according
> > http://anssiko.github.io/runtime/app-lifecycle.html).
> > 2) Load page from  "app.launch.local_path"
> >
> > I propose to remove option #2 for the following reasons:
> >
> > 1) The "app.launch.local_path" code path does not initialize "main 
> > document".
> > However, a lot of XWalk functionality relies (and newly added
> > functionality will
> > rely) on having main document (for instance non-persistent main
> > document implementation or onSuspend event support). This will cause
> > various bugs if an application is launched from "app.launch.local_path".
> > 2) Supporting of two application launch paths makes the runtime logic
> > too complicated and increases potential bugs likelihood.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > There is a concern that QA currently might use "app.launch.local_path"
> > in their test cases, so I'd like to hear a response from them.
> >
> > BR,
> > Mikhail
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Intel Finland Oy
> > Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki Business Identity Code:
> > 0357606 - 4 Domiciled in Helsinki
> >
> > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Crosswalk-dev mailing list
> > Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org
> > https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev
_______________________________________________
Crosswalk-dev mailing list
Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org
https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev

Reply via email to