It works fine now. We are an open project so why not allow anyone who has the link to add comments?
Kenneth On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Long, Xiang <xiang.l...@intel.com> wrote: > Seems it allows comments already. > Would you please try again? > As the doc is created by Intel account, so only people at Intel with the link > can comment. > > Thanks, > Xiang > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen [mailto:kenneth.christian...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 9:01 PM >> To: Long, Xiang >> Cc: Oliveira, Caio; Barbieri, Gustavo; >> crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org >> Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Tizen] Application API >> >> Again shared without allowing anyone to add comments. >> >> Kenneth >> >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Long, Xiang <xiang.l...@intel.com> wrote: >> > Thanks for the suggestion. >> > Since we'll only support Tizen API for legacy WGT apps and follow current >> Tizen WRT behavior the implementation will be much simpler. >> > >> > I made a new simple design doc: >> https://docs.google.com/a/intel.com/document/d/1ne_SKZhxVPI9fXgWDeqJkGk >> ekUpDy2if_4vK8fNXy5s/edit# >> > Please help to review it. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Xiang >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Oliveira, Caio >> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 5:05 AM >> >> To: Barbieri, Gustavo >> >> Cc: crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org; Long, Xiang >> >> Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Tizen] Application API >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I agree with Gustavo. In this case we shouldn't add new modes of >> >> operation for application execution until the ones that we are required >> >> to support are in place. The insight we gain implementing the required >> >> bits help us creating new things later. >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Caio >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 19:50 +0000, Barbieri, Gustavo wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > This proposal tries to do too much at once: support Tizen, introduce new >> >> concepts and so on. Please consider simplifying it to do what is required >> >> first >> >> and then plan to introduce new concepts. >> >> > >> >> > The Picker example, for instance, doesn't work like in that document >> >> > with >> >> Tizen. In Tizen the only way to add another application's view to current >> >> application is if you create an "ug" (UI gadget) that is actually a >> >> library, this >> will >> >> create a widget instance in the application process and push it to the >> >> current >> >> window UI stack (no interaction with the WindowManager). >> >> > >> >> > The only cases you start one application with a bundle is to start that >> >> application in some state, for instance start the phone dialer with a pre- >> >> populated number, or start "messages" with the compose screen and some >> >> fields populated, etc. After doing this via AUL you lose connection with >> >> that >> >> application, the window manager will show 2 windows, the task manager >> will >> >> show two apps, etc. >> >> > >> >> > I guess you tried to match what Android does, with their Activity and >> different >> >> launch modes (default, single-top, single-instance...). Thus let's keep >> >> those >> out, >> >> focus on the basic requirements. >> >> > >> >> > All in all I'd also choose a different work to do. As Francesco and >> >> > others >> >> pointed out, Tizen and Android diverges in supported features. Tizen, for >> >> instance, doesn't provide the basic as messages and contacts. These are >> >> simple to implement, design is straightforward and all, but requires some >> >> manpower as it's lots of code :-) >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> >> > Intel Open source Technology Center >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > -----Original Message----- >> >> > > From: Crosswalk-dev [mailto:crosswalk-dev-bounces@lists.crosswalk- >> >> > > project.org] On Behalf Of Long, Xiang >> >> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 6:47 AM >> >> > > To: Oliveira, Caio >> >> > > Cc: crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org >> >> > > Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Tizen] >> >> > > Application API >> >> > > >> >> > > Thanks for the comments. I summarized some key points below. >> >> > > >> >> > > - Currently, Tizen doesn't support "Activity-Task" like page >> >> > > ownership. As I tested on Tizen2.1, pages are binding with their >> >> > > original app. >> >> > > >> >> > > One issue of this model is: when user resume an app which was >> >> > > calling another app's functionality, the caller page will show other >> >> > > than the callee page. >> >> > > For example, a gallery app provides "pick" picture service. An user >> >> > > may resumes his Facebook app after a phone call, however can't find >> >> > > his previous "pick" photo page. >> >> > > The same issue happens when user/system kill an app. >> >> > > >> >> > > With AppContext(contains a page stack) when user open/kill/resume an >> >> > > app, he is open/kill/resume the AppContext of that app. >> >> > > Pages from that app can belongs to other AppContexts, and these >> >> > > operations will not affect such pages. >> >> > > >> >> > > - Thanks for mention the native apps, the design doc only considered >> >> > > the web apps(legacy & XPK). >> >> > > It seems we need system level modification to support both native >> >> > > and web apps. >> >> > > >> >> > > So I think currently the MAIN question is: do we just need to follow >> >> > > Tizen2.1 behavior? If yes, the AppContext stuff can be removed. If >> >> > > no, the native/web behavior will not be aligned. >> >> > > >> >> > > - For testing, app samples and xwlak-launcher messages, I think I >> >> > > can provide them when we got the consensus on the above question :) >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > -----Original Message----- >> >> > > > From: Oliveira, Caio >> >> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 5:31 AM >> >> > > > To: Long, Xiang >> >> > > > Cc: crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org >> >> > > > Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to implement: [Tizen] >> >> > > Application API >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Hello, >> >> > > > >> >> > > > On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 09:23 +0000, Long, Xiang wrote: >> >> > > > > Long term plan: AppContext support. For details please check the >> >> > > design doc: >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> https://docs.google.com/a/intel.com/document/d/1n08dzcl3fawRW2Eccg95 >> >> > > TC >> >> > > > 6DApe6RoAdUDqaZwNM8dI/edit# >> >> > > > >> >> > > > I have added some comments and questions to the design doc, please >> >> > > take >> >> > > > a look at them when it's possible, I won't replicate them all >> >> > > here. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > More questions: >> >> > > > >> >> > > > - I'm not sure that Tizen WRT actually supports an "Activity"-like >> >> > > > semantics, i.e. one app can load a "view" from other app (in our >> >> > > case a window, >> >> > > > in Android's it's an "activity). Have you tested this? >> >> > > > >> >> > > > - Why do we need to keep the stack structure for each AppContext? >> >> > > Which >> >> > > > operation >> >> > > > will make use of them? >> >> > > > >> >> > > > - Since we ask AUL, we can launch native applications, and I >> >> > > expect that we can >> >> > > > use >> >> > > > appcontrol with them as well. Is that correct? That means that our >> >> > > > "AppContext" stackes >> >> > > > will be "incomplete". How do we deal with that? >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > In my opinion things this proposal still needs work and besides >> >> > > the comments >> >> > > > in design doc and the questions above, some more general comments: >> >> > > > >> >> > > > - How will we test this feature? How can we make sure these APIs >> >> > > are >> >> > > > working as expected (i.e. working like Tizen WRT)? >> >> > > > >> >> > > > - Would be good to turn the example in the design doc into a real >> >> > > > working example, so we could see the "AppContexts" in action on >> >> > > Tizen >> >> > > > WRT. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > - Give more detail to what information needs to be passed from/to >> >> > > > the launcher process. Regardless of the implementation, the set of >> >> > > > information that needs to be communicated back and forth will be >> >> > > the same, >> >> > > > so this is not wasting time into details that might not be used. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Cheers, >> >> > > > Caio >> >> > > >> >> > > _______________________________________________ >> >> > > Crosswalk-dev mailing list >> >> > > Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org >> >> > > https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Crosswalk-dev mailing list >> > Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org >> > https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev >> >> >> >> -- >> Kenneth Rohde Christiansen >> Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. >> Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆ -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆ _______________________________________________ Crosswalk-dev mailing list Crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-dev
