> and if those cars were all sleepers people dont want to see cars they can see every day on the freeway, they want something visually interesting
> and maybe a new cast people don't want to see average looking actors, they want handsome men and attractive women > REAL (autocross, drag) racers keep getting trucks HAH yeah OK, why would average weekend racers (weekend because we have normal boring jobs during the week) like you and me drive their beater SCCA cars to rob semis? You thought the real F&F plot was bad... HAHA! > (be realistic, no under the truck driving) That was a cool stunt, people like to see cool stunts > bang its a blockbuster LOL, no, that would possibly be the biggest flop ever. I seriously doubt the average movie goer wants to see a movie about stock looking cars with average looking people driving them doing visually unexciting things like driving at freeway speeds and using their turn signals and obeying traffic laws. This is HOLLYWOOD we're talking about here, not a documentary feature. If you're going to film a fictional (yes, F&F was supposed to be fictional) action/car movie, it has to have some kind of interesting things to see and here... flashy cars (exotic cars and Ricer cars are both very flashy) AND actors with visual impact. All you people that harp so bad on F&F need to realize it was just an action movie about cars. It was NOT supposed to be a primer or documentary on the state of the import car world. Just like Point Break was not the definitive documentary about surfing, and Hackers was not the definitive documentary about the computer geek world. It's HOLLYWOOD people, give it a break. As much as people say F&F sucked so bad, I'd be willing to bet half of you own it on DVD and have watched it many times. Come on... admit it. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
