> I'll assert that deploying DES today is WORSE than deploying no crypto > at all, because of the deployed lifetime of a new product, and the > associate removal of pressure to deploy an effective cryptosystem. OpenSSL supports strong crypto. DES support is there only to allow our users to talk to crippled American browsers and the like. Those we don't deploy. Besides, as the developers of open source software we can hardly exercise pressure on our users.
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Russell Nelson
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to proto... William H. Geiger III
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... Tom Weinstein
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... James A. Donald
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding ... Adam Shostack
- write code outside US (Re: so why is IE... Adam Back
- Re: write code outside US (Re: so w... Tom Weinstein
- Re: write code outside US (Re: so w... Sameer Parekh
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Eivind Eklund
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Bodo Moeller
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to proto... Ulf M�ller
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... John Gilmore
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Nelson Minar
- Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF... Steve Mynott
- Re: Padlock Size was Re: so wh... Tom Weinstein
- Re: Padlock Size was Re: so wh... Dan Geer
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... Adam Shostack
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to protocols?... Adam Back
- RE: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to proto... Phill Hallam-Baker
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... Bodo Moeller
