> I wonder why it never occured to anyone at Netscape to write their
> crypto outside the US? (I'd have thought perhaps some of those
It's been discussed, obviously. They made a conscious decision
to rely upon lobbying rather than actual work to get what they want.
--
sameer
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... Lucky Green
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Ben Laurie
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Russell Nelson
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to proto... William H. Geiger III
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... Tom Weinstein
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... James A. Donald
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding ... Adam Shostack
- write code outside US (Re: so why is IE... Adam Back
- Re: write code outside US (Re: so w... Tom Weinstein
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding ... Sameer Parekh
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Eivind Eklund
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Bodo Moeller
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to proto... Ulf M�ller
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... John Gilmore
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Nelson Minar
- Padlock Size was Re: so why is IETF... Steve Mynott
- Re: Padlock Size was Re: so wh... Tom Weinstein
- Re: Padlock Size was Re: so wh... Dan Geer
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... Adam Shostack
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to protocols?... Adam Back
