At 9:15 PM -0700 9/21/99, Arnold Reinhold wrote: >First of all, I've always thought that Thompson's paper was >excessively defeatist. It should be possible to bootstrap an open >source C++ compiler from a simple C subset and then have several >grouts independently produce subset C compilers in assembler code. Or >compile it on ancient machines, e.g. PDP-11 using original compilers. >The bad guys can't have anticipated that far ahead. My own approach would be to audit the generated code. In KeyKOS/370, we "solved" the problem by using an assembler which was written before KeyKOS was designed. (N.B. KeyKOS/370 was written in 370 Assembler H). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | The availability and use of secure encryption may | Periwinkle | offer an opportunity to reclaim some portion of | Consulting | the privacy we have lost. - B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge |
- Re: more re Encryption Technology Limits Eased Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: more re Encryption Technology Limits Eased Sandy Harris
- Re: more re Encryption Technology Limits Eased Robert Hettinga
- Re: more re Encryption Technology Limits Ea... Declan McCullagh
- RE: more re Encryption Technology Limits Eased Rodger, William
- RE: more re Encryption Technology Limits Eased Antonomasia
- RE: more re Encryption Technology Limits Ea... Jay Holovacs
- Re: more re Encryption Technology Limits Eased William Allen Simpson
- Re: having source code for your CPU chip --... John Gilmore
- Re: having source code for your CPU chi... Arnold Reinhold
- Re: having source code for your CPU... Bill Frantz
- Re: having source code for you... Martin Minow
- Re: having source code for... Bill Frantz
- RE: more re Encryption Technology Limits Eased Antonomasia
- Re: more re Encryption Technology Limits Eased Charlie_Kaufman
- RE: more re Encryption Technology Limits Eased Trei, Peter
