On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
>on 3/1/01 9:25 pm, Greg Rose at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Goldreich... forgive me if I'm wrong. The important result, though, was
>> that you need truly random input to the algorithm in an amount equal to the
>> stuff being protected, or you cannot have unconditional security.
>
>Not so. Perfect compression with encryption works too.
Sure it does. Let us know when you figure out how to
do Perfect Compression.
Bear
- Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics John Young
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics Ray Dillinger
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics Ben Laurie
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics dmolnar
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics John Young
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metric... Greg Rose
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm M... Peter Fairbrother
- Re: Cryptographic Algorit... Ben Laurie
- Re: Cryptographic Algorit... Ray Dillinger
- Re: Cryptographic Algorit... Paul Crowley
- Re: Cryptographic Alg... Paul Crowley
- Re: Cryptographic Alg... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Cryptographic Algorit... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm M... Ben Laurie
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm M... Greg Rose
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics Paul Crowley
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics Bill Stewart
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- Perfect compression and true randomness Nick Szabo
