At 10:38 PM +0000 1/3/2001, Peter Fairbrother wrote: >on 3/1/01 9:25 pm, Greg Rose at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > At Crypto a >> couple of years ago the invited lecture gave some very general results >> about unconditionally secure ciphers... unfortunately I can't remember >> exactly who gave the lecture, but I think it might have been Oded >> Goldreich... forgive me if I'm wrong. The important result, though, was >> that you need truly random input to the algorithm in an amount equal to the >> stuff being protected, or you cannot have unconditional security. > >Not so. Perfect compression with encryption works too. > How does perfect compression prevent a known plaintext attack? Arnold Reinhold PS I am also curious why Mr. Smith considers 1024-bit RSA to be "Conditionally Computationally Secure."
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics Ben Laurie
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics dmolnar
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics John Young
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics Greg Rose
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metric... Peter Fairbrother
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm M... Ben Laurie
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm M... Ray Dillinger
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm M... Paul Crowley
- Re: Cryptographic Algorit... Paul Crowley
- Re: Cryptographic Algorit... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm M... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metric... Ben Laurie
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metric... Greg Rose
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics Paul Crowley
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics Bill Stewart
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- Perfect compression and true randomness Nick Szabo
- Re: Perfect compression and true randomnes... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Perfect compression and true rando... Paul Crowley
- Re: Perfect compression and true r... David Wagner
- Re: Cryptographic Algorithm Metrics burton rosenberg
