I for one support any and all efforts that reduce the number of supported
Python 3.x versions ;-)

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Terry Chia <terrycwk1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> FWIW I'm fully in support of this as it doesn't seem like we'll be
> dropping support for any major platforms and 3.2 use is basically nil at
> this point.
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 at 10:23 pm Paul Kehrer <paul.l.keh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Recently we've had several situations where our project's Python 3.2
>> support blocks us from using libraries we'd like to consume (idna,
>> characteristic, etc). Donald opened an issue (
>> https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/1809) with some evidence
>> that we're performing significant contortions to support a version no one
>> uses. I propose that we drop support for Python 3.2 in the next release and
>> move forward with Python 2.6 (deprecated but no timeline for removal),
>> Python 2.7, and 3.3+ support.
>>
>> I've put in a PR (https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/1846) to
>> note this in the changelog and update our travis configuration. If there
>> are no substantial objections in the next few days we can merge and then
>> update jenkins to reflect this as well.
>>
>> -Paul Kehrer
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cryptography-dev mailing list
>> Cryptography-dev@python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cryptography-dev mailing list
> Cryptography-dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Cryptography-dev mailing list
Cryptography-dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev

Reply via email to