For those not following the issue, Donald posted some graphs: https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/1846#issuecomment-94195717
Basically, no one uses this, it's old and burdensome, I'm now also +1 on dropping. Paramiko still supports 3.2 though, so I sent bitprophet a message to confirm if it's a problem for him. That said, I'm planning on merging this as soon as Paul updates it with the last issue (;-)), and we can revert if it turns out it'll be a giant issue for paramiko. Cheers, Alex On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Cory Benfield <c...@lukasa.co.uk> wrote: > On 15 April 2015 at 09:06, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: > > lol whoops, pip supports 3.2, requests still works on 3.2 though! > > Heh, yeah: we don't support 3.2 but we do support pip, so as long as > it works well enough for you then that's fine by me. > > That said, 3.2 is bad and people using it should feel bad. > _______________________________________________ > Cryptography-dev mailing list > Cryptography-dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev > -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero GPG Key fingerprint: 125F 5C67 DFE9 4084
_______________________________________________ Cryptography-dev mailing list Cryptography-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
