Cryptography-Digest Digest #828, Volume #9        Sun, 4 Jul 99 11:13:05 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Standard Hash usage (JPeschel)
  Re: Can Anyone Help Me Crack A Simple Code? ("Douglas A. Gwyn")
  --- sci.crypt charter: read before you post (weekly notice) (D. J. Bernstein)
  Something MI6 doesn't want you to know, a list of employees (Anonymous)
  Chor-Rivest Knapsack Cryptosystem ("Ki-Dong Lee")
  Re: Solitaire optimization (Bruce Schneier)
  Modern Cryptology Course (JPeschel)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JPeschel)
Subject: Re: Standard Hash usage
Date: 04 Jul 1999 07:15:49 GMT

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Keith A Monahan) writes:

>I think I can reduce the set down fairly small - and if my cracker is
>sufficiently fast, I may be done in no time.
>

Keith,

I was reconsidering your problem password.
It seems to me that since you desgined
your password to resist attacks, 
you should design specialized dictionaries
in reverse.  If, for instance, I was 
going to create a dictionary to attack
a completely unknown, but long, password, 
I would include certain characters to save
time: ETSLN and _!, for instance. You, however,
might want to include ZQJ and { | and the like. 

If your password is 12 characters long 
and you happen you to remember the first
four five characters, you could write your 
cracker so that the first four or five
characters are constant, likewise for
constant characers whose position you 
know.  

I'd also check my other "crackable" 
passwords. Might you have used the same
or similar password for stuff like pkzip, 
screensavers, word docs? 

If these sorts of dictionaries fail, 
you might want to build a dictionary
from the entire contents of your hard drive. 
Typically, when attacking a Windows
encryption program you need only build
a dictionary of printable ASCII characters.
I believe you've narrowed down the list 
even further.

Good luck. I'm going to pour myself 
a Vodka now. 

Joe








__________________________________________

Joe Peschel 
D.O.E. SysWorks                                 
http://members.aol.com/jpeschel/index.htm
__________________________________________


------------------------------

From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can Anyone Help Me Crack A Simple Code?
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 1999 08:04:19 GMT

Jerry Coffin wrote:
> Sort of true -- however, some characters are used so rarely in
> reality that especially in a message as short as 97 characters,
> they probably don't count at all.

Come on, guys, Shannon covered all this in his original paper.
There is approximately one bit of information per character in
normal English plaintext.  => about 100 bits in the 97-character
message, under the reasonable assumption that the ciphertext and
plaintext have the same size.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D. J. Bernstein)
Crossposted-To: talk.politics.crypto
Subject: --- sci.crypt charter: read before you post (weekly notice)
Date: 4 Jul 1999 05:00:38 GMT

sci.crypt               Different methods of data en/decryption.
sci.crypt.research      Cryptography, cryptanalysis, and related issues.
talk.politics.crypto    The relation between cryptography and government.

The Cryptography FAQ is posted to sci.crypt and talk.politics.crypto
every three weeks. You should read it before posting to either group.

A common myth is that sci.crypt is USENET's catch-all crypto newsgroup.
It is not. It is reserved for discussion of the _science_ of cryptology,
including cryptography, cryptanalysis, and related topics such as 
one-way hash functions.

Use talk.politics.crypto for the _politics_ of cryptography, including
Clipper, Digital Telephony, NSA, RSADSI, the distribution of RC4, and
export controls.

What if you want to post an article which is neither pure science nor
pure politics? Go for talk.politics.crypto. Political discussions are
naturally free-ranging, and can easily include scientific articles. But
sci.crypt is much more limited: it has no room for politics.

It's appropriate to post (or at least cross-post) Clipper discussions to
alt.privacy.clipper, which should become talk.politics.crypto.clipper at
some point.

There are now several PGP newsgroups. Try comp.security.pgp.resources if
you want to find PGP, c.s.pgp.tech if you want to set it up and use it,
and c.s.pgp.discuss for other PGP-related questions.

Questions about microfilm and smuggling and other non-cryptographic
``spy stuff'' don't belong in sci.crypt. Try alt.security.

Other relevant newsgroups: misc.legal.computing, comp.org.eff.talk,
comp.org.cpsr.talk, alt.politics.org.nsa, comp.patents, sci.math,
comp.compression, comp.security.misc.

Here's the sci.crypt.research charter: ``The discussion of cryptography,
cryptanalysis, and related issues, in a more civilised environment than
is currently provided by sci.crypt.'' If you want to submit something to
the moderators, try [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---Dan

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 10:25:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Anonymous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Something MI6 doesn't want you to know, a list of employees


Subject:
<�_,���`���,�_ > <�_,���`���,�_>
MI6 Drops their pants??? - THIS IS UNREAL
<�_,���`���,�_> <�_,���`���,�_ > <�_,���`���,�_>
Date: 1999/05/11
Author: Raymond Amundson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 



This article appeared in the May 14, 1999 issue of Executive Intelligence
Review. 
 
In case you have not heard, this is INCREDIBLE
 
http://www.larouchepub.com/diana_mi6_2620.html
 
The `MI6 factor' in the murder of Princess Diana
by Our Special Correspondent 

Recently, EIR was one of several news organizations that received an
unsolicited e-mail transmission, identifying senior officials of MI6, the
British foreign intelligence service, including individuals who are accused
of having been involved in the Aug. 31, 1997 deaths of Princess Diana, Dodi
Fayed, and Henri Paul. The three were killed in a car crash in Paris, that,
to this day, remains one of the great unsolved mysteries of the 20th century.
 
More than 21 months after the crash, the official French
investigation, headed by Judge Herv� Stephan, is still under way, and some
of the most disturbing questions about the fatal crash remain unanswered,
including the most basic question: Was it an assassination?
 
EIR has been well-known for our exhaustive coverage of the death of
Princess Diana, identifying otherwise unpublished leads, and pointing to
the involvement of British and other intelligence agencies, in the run-up
to the crash, and in the effort to cover up the evidence that Princess
Diana and Dodi Fayed were the targets of a murder plot. 
 
Some of the information provided in the e-mail posting has been
independently verified by EIR. Indeed, three MI6 officials, identified as
having been intimately involved in the events leading up to the fatal
crash, and the ensuing cover-up, have been previously identified by EIR as
suspected culprits, acting on behalf of the House of Windsor, under the
personal orders of Prince Philip.
 
In late 1997, EIR published exclusive photographs showing that a team of at
least seven men were surveilling the Ritz Hotel on the evening of Aug. 30,
1997--during the final hours before the crash in the Place d'Alma tunnel.
 
As this issue of EIR goes to press, a French court is in the process of
deciding whether Judge Stephan will be ordered to pursue further leads on
the crash provided by Mohamed Al Fayed, the father of Dodi Fayed, who has
made numerous public statements to the effect that he believes that the
crash was not an accident. Al Fayed is a civil party to the case, and, as
such, is entitled, under French law, to present new leads and evidence for
consideration by the chief investigator before the final report is released.
 
In the interest of furthering the investigation into the Paris crash, we
publish the text of the anonymous document below. We cannot, at this time,
independently authenticate many of the details provided. However, we pass
the document along as "raw" material. As we pursue the leads contained in
the document, we will keep our readers informed. Here is the e-mail text
(the names section contains the year and city to which the alleged agents
were posted):
 
The e-mail posting 

Professor Pritchard of Gonville and Cauis College Cambridge is the leading
recruiter for MI6 agents. He identifies and recruits the most intellectual
geniuses for MI6.
 
The following three people are members of MI6, an organisation which forms
this supposed great country's intelligence service. It manipulates the
ordinary people of this country who are unaware of its illegal activities.
 
Sir David Spedding--Head of MI6--was ordered to organise the murder of
Diana, Princess of Wales and her friend Dodi Al Fayed.
 
Richard David Spearman--Chief of staff for Sir David Spedding. He was given
an assignment and moved to Paris two weeks prior to the murder of Diana,
Princess of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed.
 
Nicholas John Andrew Langman--Principal assistant to Richard Spearman. He
was also involved with Spedding in the murder.
 
Richard Billing Dearlove--the incoming Head of MI6 in September 1999--was
in Paris two weeks before the Aug. 31, 1997 crash.
 
The attached list identifies the unprincipled and unscrupulous individuals
involved with MI6 worldwide. The list was produced by an honest man who has
since left MI6 because he felt that the behaviour of that organisation was
unacceptable in a civilised society. They are accountable to nobody for
their law breaking activities. They are subordinated to the elite people of
this country, for example the Royal household and the establishment.
 
The whole world should be aware of these individuals and their
capabilities. British citizens need to know that these people are supported
by those ruling this country. This "Al Capone" style organisation has
removed the human rights of ordinary people, not only in this country but
worldwide.
 
Names 

Dudley Charles Ankerson: 78 Buenos Aires, 85 Mexico, 93 Madrid; dob 1948; Dr.
 
Raymond Benedict Barthol Asquith: 83 Moscow, 92 Kiev; dob 1952;
Viscount.
 
Kerry Charles Bagshaw: 82 Geneva, 88 Moscow; dob 1943; OBE.
 
Ian Clive Barnard: 94 Geneva; dob 1965.
 
Richard Martin Donne Barrett: 83 Ankara, 88 New York, 97 Amman; dob 1949.
 
James Lloyd Baxendale: 94 Cairo (MECAS), 97 Amman; dob 1967.
 
Jonathan Beales.
 
Peter John William Black: 74 MECAS, 77 Kuwait, 80 Amman, 87 Dhaka; dob 1946.
 
Jamie Blount.
 
Rupert Bowen: 90 Windhoek, 92 Tirana.
 
Andrew Jonathan Corrie Boyd: 81 Accra, 88 Mexico City, 96 Islamabad; dob 1950.
 
Andrew James Brear: 94 Santiago; dob 1960.
 
Christopher Mark Breeze: 88 Nicosia, 94 New Delhi; dob 1963.
 
Alastair Breeze.
 
Richard Philip Bridge: 86 Warsaw, 88 Moscow; dob 1959.
 
Stuart Armitage Brooks: 72 Rio, 75 Lisbon, 79 Moscow, 87 Stockholm, 93
Moscow; dob 1948; OBE.
 
Christopher Parker Burrows: 82 East Berlin, 87 Bonn, 93 Athens; dob 1958.
 
George Benedict Joseph P Busby: 89 Bonn, 92 Belgrade; dob 1960; OBE. 
 
Geoff Chittenden.
 
Robert John Paul Church: 76 Bankok, 81 Berlin, 86 Nairobi, 89 Bangkok, 97
Nairobi; dob 1947.
 
Timothy Clayden: 91 Warsaw, 95 Lagos; dob 1960; Wanker.
 
Martin Hugh Clements: 86 Tehran, 90 Vienna; dob 1961.
 
John Donovan Nelson Clibborn: 66 Nicosia, 72 Bonn, 72 Brussels, 88
Washington; dob 1941; CMG.
 
Peter Salmon Collecot: 80 Khartoum, 82 Canberra, 93 Jakarta; dob 1950. 
 
Andrew David Cordery: 75 Nairobi, 77 New York, 84 Lusaka, 88 Berlin, 95
Oslo; dob 1947.
 
Sherard Louis Cowper-Coles: 80 Cairo, 87 Washington; dob 1955; CMG, LVO.
 
Keith Craig: dob 1961.
 
John Martin Jamie Darke: 88 Cairo, 96 Dubai; dob 1953.
 
Michael Hayward Davenport: 89 Warsaw, 96 Moscow; dob 1961.
 
Peter Brian Davies: 83 Rome, 88 Peking, 96 Jakarta; dob 1954,
 
Richard Billing Dearlove: 68 Nairobi, 73 Prague, 80 Paris, 87 Geneva, 91
Washington; dob 1945; OBE.
 
John Deerlove.
 
Keith Derek Evetts: 75 Warsaw, 77 Maputo, 83 New York, 86 Kingston, 88
Lisbon; dob 1948; OBE.
 
Michael Edward Joseph Feliks: 93 Peking; dob 1964; Dr.
 
Robert Dominic Russell Fenn: 85 Hague, 88 Lagos, 92 New York; dob 1962.
 
Nicholas Bernard Frank Fishwick: 88 Lagos, 94 Istanbul; dob 1958; Dr. 
 
Richard George Hopper Fletcher: 68 Athens, 69 Nicosia, 73 Bucharest, 85
Athens; dob 1944; CMG.
 
Richard Andrew Foulsham: 84 Brunei, 86 Lagos, 95 Rome; dob 1950. 
 
Rosalind Mary Elizabeth Fowler: 90 Hong Kong; dob 1965.
 
Michael Roger Fox: 93 Geneva; dob 1958.
 
Richard Ogilby Leslie Fraser-Darling: 73 Helsinki, 84 Washington; dob 1949.
 
Robert Andrew Fulton: 69 Saigon, 73 Rome, 78 Berlin, 84 Oslo, 89 New York;
dob 1944.
 
Kevin Andrew Garvey: 81 Bangkok, 85 Hanoi, 92 Phnom Penh; dob 1960. 
 
John Henry Cary Gerson: 69 Hong Kong, 71 Singapore, 74 Peking, 87 Hong
Kong; dob 1945.
 
Andrew Patrick Somerset Gibbs: 79 Rio, 84 Moscow, 87 Pretoria; dob 1951; OBE.
 
Sean Goodman.
 
Anita Goodman.
 
Jacqueline Goodman.
 
Keith Rutherford Gosling: 75 Singapore, 78 Vienna, 86 Manila, 93 Tel Aviv;
dob 1944; OBE.
 
Roger Patrick Hamilton: 78 Jakarta, 82 Tokyo, 84 Hong Kong, 89
Copenhagen; dob 1948.
 
Roger John Hargreaves: 73 Hong Kong, 76 Sanaa, 85 Hong Kong, 96
Wellington; dob 1950.
 
Samuel Andrew Roland Hatfield: 95 Lagos; dob 1963.
 
Steven John Hill: 88 Vienna, 96 New York; dob 1962.
 
Katherine Sarah-Julia Horner: 85 Moscow, 97 Moscow; dob 1952.
 
Thomas Rober Benedict Hurd: 95 Warsaw; dob 1964.
 
Robert Mitchell Forest Kelly: 74 Nairobi, 80 Turkey, 81 Ankara, 95 Ottowa;
dob 1946.
 
Theodore Maurice Kenwrick-Pierc: 74 Brussels, 82 Nicosia, 88 Hague, 94
Athens; dob 1948.
 
Alex Kershaw: 97 Geneva; dob 1967.
 
Nicholas John Andrew Langman: 86 Montevideo, 88 New York, 94 Paris; dob 1960.
 
Edmund John Scott Latter: 94 Istanbul; dob 1968.
 
Jeremy John Legge: 87 Lusaka, 94 Vienna; dob 1961.
 
Gareth Geoffrey Lungley: dob 1971.
 
Christine Anne MacQueen: 84 Brasilia, 89 New York, 90 Paris; dob 1959. 
 
Norman James MacSween: 72 Nairobi, 77 Tehran, 83 Bonn, 91 Stockholm, 95
Moscow; dob 1948.
 
Iain Arthur Gray Matthewson: 81 New York, 85 Warsaw, 93 Prague; dob 1952.
 
Ian Forbes McCredie: 76f Lusaka, 79 Tehran, 83 Copenhagen, 92 New York; dob
1950; OBE.
 
Patrick Joseph McGuinness: 88 Sanaa, 94 Abu Dhabi, 96 Cairo; dob 1963; OBE.
 
Justin James McKenzie Smit: 96 Moscow; dob 1969.
 
William John Clovis Meath-Baker: 88 Kabul, 89 Prague, 97 Istanbul; dob 1959.
 
Andrew Jonathan Mitchell: 93 Bonn; dob 1967.
 
Anthony Leopold Colyer Monckton: 90 Geneva, 96 Zagreb; dob 1960. 
 
Richard Peter Moore: 90 Ankara, 91 Istanbul, 95 Islamabad; dob 1963. 
 
Mark Scott Thomas Morgan: 84 Geneva, 88 Aden, 94 Valletta; dob 1958; MBE.
 
Stuart Richard Morley: 89 San Jose, 90 Bridgetown, 96 Hague; dob 1959. 
 
Clive Dare Newell: 79 Tehran, 82 Kabul, 86 Addis, 90 Bosnia, 94
Ankara; dob 1953.
 
Peter James Norris: 85 Lagos, 90 Guatemala; dob 1955, Dr.
 
Peter David Orwin: 77 Athens, 84 Brasilia, 89 Tel Aviv, 96 Hague; dob 1944;
OBE, MC.
 
Christopher Robert Geoffrey Pagett: 78 Havana, 79 Lusaka, 88 Maputo, 97 New
York; dob 1952; OBE.
 
Colin Douglas Partridge: 80 Delhi, 87 Hanoi, 94 Hong Kong; dob 1955. 
 
Martin Eric Penton-Voak: 95 Moscow; dob 1965.
 
Geoffrey Colin Perry: 81 Hong Kong, 92 Geneva; dob 1951.
 
Alan Petty.
 
Richard William Potter: 85 Riyadh, 88 Nicosia; dob 1960.
 
Mark Precious: Buenos Aires 86; dob 1960.
 
John Andrew Raine: 88 Kuwait, 94 Damascus, 97 Riyadh; dob 1962.
 
Michael Charles Ramscar: 77 Lagos, 79 Brasilia, 86 Madrid, 89 San Jose, 97
Madrid; dob 1948.
 
Timothy Simeon Rawlinson: 91 Lagos, 96 Stockholm; dob 1962.
 
Richard Robert Reeve: 73 Singapore, 77 Hong Kong, 83 Hong Kong; dob 1948.
 
Michael John Regan: 86 Kabul, 89 Dubai, 95 Bangkok; dob 1955.
 
Peter Marius Julian Prows Reilly: 96 Khartoum; dob 1971.
 
John Ridd.
 
Janet Elizabeth Rogan: 91 Peking, 98 Sarajevo; dob 1962.
 
John McLeod Scarlett: 73 Nairobi, 76 Moscow, 84 Paris, 91 Moscow; dob 1948;
OBE.
 
Deborah Jane Soothill: 96 Peking; dob 1969.
 
Richard David Spearman: 92 Istanbul, 97 Paris; dob 1960.
 
David Spedding.
 
Guy David St. John Kelso Spindler: 87 Moscow, 97 Pretoria; dob 1962. 
 
Andrew Jeremy Stafford: 77 Stockholm, 79 Accra, 84 Prague, 91
Brussels; dob 1953.
 
Christopher David Steele: 90 Moscow; dob 1964.
 
Geoffrey Tantum.
 
Anthony Jonathan Terry: 70 Nairobi, 73 Havana, 79 Belgrade, 86
Santiago, 97 Geneva; dob 1946.
 
Richard Paul Reynier Thompson: 91 Stockholm, 96 Geneva; dob 1960. 
 
Michael Thomson.
 
Daniel Vernon Thornton: 95 Brussels; dob 1969.
 
Stuart Graham Turvill: 95 Islamabad; dob 1971.
 
John Venning.
 
Richard Vlaistow: 95 Havana.
 
James Spencer Kennedy Watson: 91 Kuwait, 97 Damascus; dob 1964.
 
Andrew Whiteside: 95 Budapest; dob 1968.
 
Mark Williams: 95 Tehran.
 
Kenneth Mark Williams: 76 Kuala Lumpur, 79 Bridgetown, 88 Harare, 94 Delhi;
dob 1944.
 
Simon Jules Wilson: 91 Athens, 93 Zagreb; dob 1966; OBE.
 
Julian Paul Geoffrey Wiseman: 78 Geneva, 84 Dhaka, 90 Islamabad; dob 1944.
 
David John Woods: 78 Vienna, 81 Bucharest, 92 Harare, 97 Pretoria; dob 1951.
 
Ian Alexander Woods: 77 New York, 84 Berlin, 86 Bonn, 95 Warsaw; dob 1951.
 
Alexander William Younger: 95 Vienna; dob 1963. 






------------------------------

From: "Ki-Dong Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Chor-Rivest Knapsack Cryptosystem
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 04:21:43 +0900

Hello.

  I am looking for the source codes of Chor-Rivest Knapsack Cryptosystem.
May I get the code? How?








------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Schneier)
Subject: Re: Solitaire optimization
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 1999 14:31:58 GMT

On Wed, 23 Jun 1999 21:46:13 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>There are some interesting tradeoffs here. The inconvenience of
>memorizing passphrases with 90+ bits of entropy, one for each message,
>and spending a couple hours painstaking preparing a deck with them even
>before encryption/decryption begins, might make it too inconvenient to
>bother using encryption at all. If you write down the deck, you have to
>keep the physical piece of paper secure, but encrypting and decrypting
>becomes much more convenient. (* SPOILER FOLLOWS *) Note that in the
>novel, characters died because it took too long to encrypt the message
>which would have saved them.
>
>It's clear that speed matters. Has anyone timed doing RC4 by hand? And
>no one wants to comment on whether cutting the deck length or simplifing
>the output step makes Solitaire less secure?

I recommend against making the deck smaller or simplifying the
algorithm.

Historically, these ciphers have been slow.  There is a Soviet
pen-and-paper cipher described in Kahn on Codes.  It takes a few hours
to encrypt or decrypt a message.

Bruce
**********************************************************************
Bruce Schneier, President, Counterpane Systems     Phone: 612-823-1098
101 E Minnehaha Parkway, Minneapolis, MN  55419      Fax: 612-823-1590
           Free crypto newsletter.  See:  http://www.counterpane.com

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JPeschel)
Subject: Modern Cryptology Course
Date: 04 Jul 1999 14:06:13 GMT

To the "Key Recovery Resources" page of
my web site I've recently added the slides
to Dr. Eli Biham's "Modern Cryptology Course."

The topics include:
Substitution Ciphers and Shannon's Theory

Block Ciphers and DES 

Differential Cryptanalysis

Cryptanalytic Time-Memory Tradeoff 

Hashing and One Time Signatures

Merkle's Puzzles 

Public Key Cryptography and 
  Introduction to Number Theory

Zero Knowledge Protocols
 
Secret Sharing 

Mutual Commitments  

I am hosting the files on one of my sites.
The only change made to the original files
is that they have been gzipped.

Joe   

__________________________________________

Joe Peschel 
D.O.E. SysWorks                                 
http://members.aol.com/jpeschel/index.htm
__________________________________________


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and sci.crypt) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

End of Cryptography-Digest Digest
******************************

Reply via email to