L. Sassaman writes: > PGP's source code has always been available for public review. This has > not changed. There are no "back doors" for the NSA in PGP, <paranoia>Unless they are particularly subtle ones, based on a mathematical understanding that is not yet publicly known. Remember that the NSA knew about differential cryptanalysis well before anyone else. Times have changed, but maybe less than we think.</paranoia> -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | "Ask not what your country 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | can force other people to Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | do for you..." -Perry M.
- Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES instead of ... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES in... John Gilmore
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DE... John Young
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use o... Russell Nelson
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet u... John Kelsey
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's qu... David Honig
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DE... John Kelsey
- Microsoft Condoms (may have pinholes) (Re: C... David Honig
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES in... Matt Blaze
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES in... Rodger, William
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES in... Dennis Glatting
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES in... Dennis Glatting
- Re: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES in... Matt Blaze
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES in... Paul Kierstead