At 10:01 PM 05/24/2000 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >Amusing though the MS/NSA speculations are, I'm more interested in the >general point: i.e. proving that primes are prime. Having a black box >that claims to do that doesn't really light my fire. The most interesting thing I find about the discussion is to identify specific weak links within a system that provide the most benefit to an attacker. At the same time, we identify the parts of the system that most need review, analysis, and testing, when we identify the weak links. Rick. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES inste... Paul Kierstead
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of DES ... David Honig
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use of ... Arnold G. Reinhold
- RE: Critics blast Windows 2000's quiet use... Rick Smith
- Re: NSA back doors in encryption produ... John Gilmore
- Re: NSA back doors in encryption ... Ben Laurie
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Enzo Michelangeli
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Ben Laurie
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Rick Smith
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Ben Laurie
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Rick Smith
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Bill Stewart
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Ben Laurie
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Matt Crawford
- Re: NSA back doors in encryption ... Rick Smith
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Rick Smith
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Eugene Leitl
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Enzo Michelangeli
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... Eugene Leitl
- Re: NSA back doors in encrypt... David Honig