Lynn and John Saylior have raised an important point. Who at Baltimore, or was once there, is likely to be able to account for the security of the certs for customers who still rely upon them? Not somebody to spin a fairy tale, but to truthfully explain what Baltimore has done to avoid betraying the trust of its customers, or handing that trust over to others who may not have Baltimore's scruples or be bound by its promises.
Not that Baltimore's investors would give a hoot, but customers might want to know who to challenge about their private, once secure, data. This matter is important for it is a bellweather of what's to come with failure of other trusted parties or who or bought by less scrupulous if more financially endowed than always absolutely trustworthy crypto corporations. The recent stink about betrayal of customer data with JetBlue, Acxiom and eBay is timely. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
