I, for one, hate the idea. My From address should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's my remailer where I receive all my incoming e-mail. However, my outgoing SMTP server depends on which cable modem provider or hot spot I happen to be at the moment. It would be that SMTP machine that signs my outgoing mail, not acm.org who never sees my outgoing mail.
So, in capsule: this proposal assumes that you use the same machine for outgoing and incoming e-mail. +------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Carl M. Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://theworld.com/~cme | | PGP: 75C5 1814 C3E3 AAA7 3F31 47B9 73F1 7E3C 96E7 2B71 | +---Officer, arrest that man. He's whistling a copyrighted song.---+ > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Rodger > Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 7:01 PM > To: Steve Bellovin; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: yahoo to use public key technology for anti-spam > > Steve Bellovin wrote: > >http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/12/05/spam.yahoo.reut/ > > > Does anyone have details? How much overhead would this entail? > > And how, btw, should we feel about having to sign every > message from our > very own vanity domains? > > Will Rodger > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The Cryptography Mailing List > Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]