John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >They eventually censored out all the sample application scenarios like DRM'd >online music, and ramped up the level of jargon significantly, so that nobody >reading it can tell what it's for any more. Now all the documents available >at that site go on for pages and pages saying things like "FIA_UAU.1 Timing of >authentication. Hierarchical to: No other components. FIA_UAU.1.1 The TSF >shall allow access to data and keys where entity owner has given the 'world' >access based on the value of TCPA_AUTH_DATA_USAGE; access to the following >commands: TPM_SelfTestFull, TPM_ContinueSelfTest, TPM_GetTestResult, >TPM_PcrRead, TPM_DirRead, and TPM_EvictKey on behalf of the user to be >performed before the user is authenticated."
That gobbledigook sounds like Common Criteria-speak. So it's not deliberate, it's a side-effect of making it CC-friendly. >nobody reading it can tell what it's for any more Yup, that's definitely Common Criteria. Peter. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]