In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ian Grigg writes:
>Peter Gutmann wrote:
>> "Steven M. Bellovin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>Maybe it's worth doing some sort of generic RFC for this security model to
>>>>avoid scattering the same thing over a pile of IETF WGs,
>>>
>>>Sounds good. Who wants to write it...?
>>
>> Since there seems to be at least some interest in this, I'll make a start on
>> it. If anyone else wants to add their $0.03 to it [0], let me know.
>
>It occurs to me that a number of these ideas could
>be written up over time ... a wiki, anyone? I think
>it is high past time to start documenting crypto
>patterns.
>
For RFCs, there are two paths. If the topic is general enough (and, of
course, the advice is good enough), Russ Housley or I would consider
sponsoring the document as a BCP. If it's narrow or we're not
interested for some reason (other than quality, of course), it could be
an individual submission. I encourage both paths.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
