Ian G writes: | | In the end, the digital signature was just crypto | candy... |
On the one hand a digital signature should matter more the bigger the transaction that it protects. On the other hand, the bigger the transaction the lower the probability that it is between strangers who have no other leverage for recourse. And, of course, proving anything by way of dueling experts doesn't provide much predictability in a jury system, e.g., OJ Simpson. --dan --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
