[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* That which was not recorded did not happen. * That which is not documented does not exist. * That which has not been audited is vulnerable.and he did not mean this in the "paths to invisibility" sense but rather that you have liability unless you can prove that you don't.
Thanks for the quote. But "That which was not recorded did not happen" and the other two points can, and IMO should, also be taken in the positive sense that you need recorded, credible, audited evidence in order to support business in case arguments (as they do) arise. Trust depends on parallel channels. So based, trust actually reduces liability. The knife cuts the other way too, and that's why unrevocably expiring documents that can be so treated (legally and business wise) is also necessary to reduce liability. Cheers, Ed Gerck --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
