"Saqib Ali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I compile a lot of software on my laptop, and I *certainly notice* the >difference between my office laptop (no encryption) and my travel laptop >(with FDE). The laptops are exactly the same, with the same image loaded. The >only difference is the FDE software that is installed on the travel laptop.
That's because you're doing something that produces worst-case behaviour. The (obvious) solution is the standard "don't do that, then". My main development machine builds to a RAM drive, and for some odd reason I don't notice any disk access latency at all. >But that is because it only support 128 bit AES, which is a major drawback as >most enterprise settings require at least 256 bit AES. "Realising the importance of the case, my men are applying twice the usual amount of tinfoil". Peter. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]