On Nov 21, 2009, at 6:12 PM, Bill Frantz wrote:

[email protected] (Jerry Leichter) on Saturday, November 21, 2009 wrote:

It's no big deal to read these cards,
and from many times the inch or so that the standard readers require.

So surely someone has built a portable reader for counterfeiting the cards
they read in restaurants near big target companies...
Well, my building card is plain white. If anyone duplicated it, there'd be nothing stopping them from going in. But then the actual security offered by those cards - and the building controls - is more for show (and I suppose to keep the "riffraff" out - than anything else.

My work card has my photo and name on it, but there's nothing to correlate name with underlying ID in normal operation. Snap a photo of the card while you clone it, make up a reasonable simulacrum with your own picture and name, and walk right in.

Not really more or less secure than the old days when you flashed you (easily copied) badge to a card who probably only noticed that it was about the right size and had roughly the right color. But it's higher tech, so an improvement. :-)

Physical security for most institutions has never been very good, and fortunately has never *needed* to be very good. Convenience wins out, and technology gives a nice warm feeling. A favorite example: My wife's parents live in a secured retirement community. The main entrance has a guard who checks if you're on a list of known visitors, or calls the people you're visiting if not. Residents used to have a magnetic card, but that's a bit of pain to use. So it was replaced by a system probably adapted from railroad freight card ID systems: You stick big barcode in your passenger side window, and a laser scanner on a post reads it and opens the door.

Of course, it's trivial to duplicate the sticker using a simple photo, and since the system has to work from varying distances, at varying angles, on moving cars, in all light and weather conditions, it can't possibly be highly discriminating - almost certainly just a simple Manchester-style decoder.

                                                        -- Jerry

Cheers - Bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz |"After all, if the conventional wisdom was working, the 408-356-8506 | rate of systems being compromised would be going down,
www.periwinkle.com | wouldn't it?" -- Marcus Ranum

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [email protected]

Reply via email to