Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
> Kaspersky: Sham Certificates Pose Big Problem for Windows Security
> from above ..
> Windows fails to clearly indicate when digital security certificates
> have been tampered with, according to Kaspersky Lab's Roel Schouwenberg,
> and that opens a door for malware makers.

Huh? I don't understand the argument being made here.

Obviously Windows can't distinguish an unsigned executable from one where
the was a signature that has been stripped. How could it possibly do that?

Signatures are largely a distraction from the real problem: that software
is (unnecessarily) run with the full privileges of the invoking user.
By all means authenticate software, but that's not going to prevent malware.

David-Sarah Hopwood  ⚥

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to