On 09/08/2013 09:15 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
Perhaps you don't see the big worry, but real world experience says it is something everyone else should worry about anyway.

I overstated it.

Good random numbers are crucial, and like any cryptography, exact details matter. Programmers are constantly making embarrassing mistakes. (The recent Android RNG bug, was that Sun, Oracle, or Google?)

But there is no special reason to worry about corrupted HW RNGs because one should not be using them as-is, there are better ways to get good random data, ways not obvious to a naive civilian, but still well known.

Snowden reassured us when he said that good cryptography is still good cryptography. If that includes both hashes and cyphers, then the fundamental components of sensible hybrid RNGs are sound.

Much more worrisome is whether Manchurian Circuits have been added to any hardware, no matter its admitted purpose, just waiting to be activated.

-kb

_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Reply via email to