On 10 September 2013 11:29, Peter Gutmann <pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
> Ben Laurie <b...@links.org> writes: > > >We need to get an extension number allocated, since the one it uses > clashes > >with ALPN. > > It does? draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-01 doesn't mention ID 0x10 > anywhere. > > (In any case -encrypt-then-MAC got there first, these Johnny-come-lately's > can > find their own ID to squat on :-). > Feel free to argue the toss with IANA: http://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-extensiontype-values/tls-extensiontype-values.xhtml . In the meantime, I suggest getting a new number would be more productive. Which, apparently, means first getting adopted by the TLS WG. Alternatively, allocate a random number.
_______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list cryptography@metzdowd.com http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
