Tony Arcieri <basc...@gmail.com> writes: >On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Bill Frantz <fra...@pwpconsult.com> wrote: >> After Rijndael was selected as AES, someone suggested the really paranoid >> should super encrypt with all 5 finalests in the competition. Five level >> super encryption is probably overkill, but two or three levels can offer >> some real advantages. > >I wish there was a term for this sort of design in encryption systems beyond >just "defense in depth". AFAICT there is not such a term. > >How about the Failsafe Principle? ;)
How about Stannomillinery? Peter. _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list cryptography@metzdowd.com http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
