On Sep 17, 2013, at 5:49 AM, ianG <i...@iang.org> wrote:
>> I wish there was a term for this sort of design in encryption systems
>> beyond just "defense in depth". AFAICT there is not such a term.
>> How about the Failsafe Principle? ;)
> A good question.  In my work, I've generally modelled it such that the entire 
> system still works if one algorithm fails totally.  But I don't have a name 
> for that approach.
How about the X Property (Trust No One - with a different slant on "One")?

                                                        -- Jerry :-)

The cryptography mailing list

Reply via email to