On Sep 17, 2013, at 5:49 AM, ianG <i...@iang.org> wrote: >> >> I wish there was a term for this sort of design in encryption systems >> beyond just "defense in depth". AFAICT there is not such a term. >> >> How about the Failsafe Principle? ;) > > A good question. In my work, I've generally modelled it such that the entire > system still works if one algorithm fails totally. But I don't have a name > for that approach. How about the X Property (Trust No One - with a different slant on "One")?
-- Jerry :-) _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography