2013/9/29 James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com> > (..) fact, they are not provably random, selected (...) > fixed that for you
It seems obvious that blatant lying about qualities of procedures must have some malignant intention, yet ignorance is as good an explanation. I don't think lying the other way would solve anything. It's obviously not especially secure.
_______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography