On 03/19/2012 05:22 PM, Marsh Ray wrote:
On 03/19/2012 06:22 PM, Arshad Noor wrote:

* IBM's developerWorks.com. http://ibm.co/rc3dw

Regulatory compliant cloud computing security ... in a box!
Brilliant!

        Our key-management comes in a box; the architecture does not.

I'll just go out on a limb here and guess that the weak link in the
system will be the Xray tech's Windows XP embedded IE6 web browser that
she's using for work email (if not Facebook) and also for setting the
cathode voltage and exposure time.

        Business people are in the business of taking risks. Tolerances
        vary, but that's why they get paid.  Security practitioners
        might like a perfect world; but the business person does not
        care - they're only willing to assume the risk they believe
        they can balance with their over-arching goal to make money.

        If the healthcare industry truly cared about people's privacy,
        they could have solved the problem a long time ago.  But the
        doctors in the industry have a trump card that slows adoption
        of more secure environments: protecting your life.

        It is my opinion that businesses will go to the Cloud - and damn
        the torpedoes.  (The drum-beats from AWS, Salesforce, etc. at
        the HIMSS 2012 conference were deafening).  The reasons for
        moving to the Cloud are compelling (starting with the business
        executives' bonus from the additional EPS when they get rid of
        the capital & operating expenses on in-house IT equipment and
        salaries).

        To the extent the architecture can help address some holes
        before the exodus to the Cloud begins, the RC3 architecture is
        out there for the taking/improvement - no royalties required.

Arshad Noor
StrongAuth, Inc.
_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Reply via email to