On Oct 25, 2012, at 9:44 AM, Ben Laurie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Jon Callas <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> As someone who is one of the DKIM authors, I can but roll my eyes and shrug. > > As someone who sees the effects of actually using DKIM, I can but roll > my eyes and shrug. In short, it turns out to be a pretty bad idea to > hard fail on DKIM because it totally doesn't work with mailing lists. > Which makes it pretty useless, key size cockups or no. > > Why did the authors of DKIM not deal with this problem?
Instead of wasting bandwidth on a cryptography mailing list, might I suggest that you look at the DKIM WG mailing list? Saying that the the authors of DKIM not deal with this problem is absurd. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
