On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Thierry Moreau <[email protected]> wrote: > Jeffrey Walton wrote: >>> >>> ... >> Perhaps they should be using the evil bit in the TCP/IP header to >> indicate someone (or entity) is tampering with the secure channel? >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3514. > > That's an April 1st RFC! > > Oh, maybe this whole thread is a bit in advance with the calendar. It needs to be updated for IPv6, too :)
> More seriously, I agree that the questions raised by Jeffrey are relevant, > and I support his main point. End-to-end security should make some sense, > even today. I think a layman expects end-to-end security. As a more informed user, I also expect end-to-end security. What befuddles me is some folks don't expect it (or perhaps don't want it?). I am amazed at how the industry has conditioned them. Jeff _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
