-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Jan 10, 2013, at 4:47 PM, Peter Gutmann wrote: > Jon Callas <[email protected]> writes: > >> Others have said pretty much the same in this thread; this isn't an MITM >> attack, it's a proxy browsing service. > > Exactly. Cellular providers have been doing this for ages, it's hardly news. > > (Well, OK, given how surprised people seem to be, perhaps it should be news > in > order to make it more widely known :-). Yes. I wouldn't use such a service, and it's why I installed Firefox and Chrome on my Fire. I'm not going use Silk. I admire the technology, but it's not for me. Jon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Universal 3.2.0 (Build 1672) Charset: us-ascii wj8DBQFQ8GtBsTedWZOD3gYRArZAAKDMS6s0vPmZ2Gfg3UHzurfDRoAecACfVmsz BDhSNZIO/eXyi5wdJxOhFRw= =534L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
