On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Natanael <natanae...@gmail.com> wrote: > For all you know the PRNG could be doing nothing more > than doing SHA256 of a fixed value plus a counter
Yes, and in an application where even that trivial design would serve to fit some use, testing the apparent randomness.of proposed hash functions against themselves, and proof sampling operational matters, would still be useful to do. To that end, here is one tool that was forwarded off list... http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/toolkit/rng/index.html _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
