And there's your problem - you can at best only add gateways/proxies, you can't actually improve the existing protocols in any meaningful way.
- Sent from my phone Den 25 nov 2013 21:09 skrev "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" < [email protected]>: > I'm strongly against most the ideas to abbandon current email systems, > because the results will be to create wallet garden. > > We need something interoperable with existing systems or the system will > just be used by a bunch of paranoid people or fostered by the marketing > of few cryptography company acquiring customers, not user. > > So we need IETF standards, interoperable with existing email standard > protocols (SMTP, IMAP, MIME). > > I'm just very disappointed that many of us look at the moon, trying to > invent something new, when there are so many improvements to be done on > existing interoperable platforms. > > Let's first cut-off the massive passive traffic analysis, then improve > current systems to provide some added protection against metadata, > focusing in a far future, when the new system got already wide adoption, > make it perfect. > > Fabio > > Il 11/25/13, 7:20 PM, Natanael ha scritto: > > > > Say hello to Bote mail on I2P. > > > > I2P provides encrypted anonymizing networking, Bote mail provides DHT > > based serverless encrypted mailing with public crypto keys as > > addresses (ECDSA or NTRU). > > > > http://i2p2.de and i2pbote.i2p (if you don't have I2P installed, add > > .us to visit it via an inproxy). > > > > There is also I2P Messenger that is encrypted P2P IM within I2P also > > using public keys as addresses. > > > > _______________________________________________ > cryptography mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography >
_______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
