That can really only be solved by gateways, IMHO. It's the only way to talk between the systems that don't put limits on how secure either one can be.
- Sent from my phone Den 26 nov 2013 16:09 skrev "c1cc10" <r...@isolved.it>: > If we're discussing about this topic it is because of people. emails are > one people's need: as techis we could create and use any other fancy > communication means and do not bother. > So if we want to bring a new communication infrastructure for everybody > we cannot jump over the existing one, which sadly is the unsecurable email. > Thus we need to consider back-compatibility for any upgrade of the email > protocol, in order to let anyone use it as they do it now. > > my 2 cents > > Francesco Rana > >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Stephen Farrell > >> <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > >>> ... > >>> Personally, I'm not at all confident that we can do something > >>> that provides end-to-end security, can be deployed at full > >>> Internet scale and is compatible with today's email protocols. > >>> But if others are more optimistic then I'm all for 'em trying > >>> to figure it out and would be delighted to be proven wrong. > >> > > _______________________________________________ > cryptography mailing list > cryptography@randombit.net > http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography >
_______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
